Top 5 countries with the highest IPv4 demand in 2025

StephanieStephanie
ipv4-demand

Standfirst — As IPv4 remains scarce, some nations show particularly strong demand for legacy IP resources. Knowing which helps guide leasing or acquisition strategies.

  • The United States, China, Japan, Germany and the UK are the top nations demanding IPv4, reflecting both legacy allocation and continuing pressure to support IPv4-only services.
  • For organisations using i.Lease, focusing on these high-demand markets is key — competition is fierce, but so is the value of clean, compliant IPv4 space.
ip-block-risk-score

What “IPv4 demand” means — and why it matters

When we talk about “IPv4 demand,” we refer to the pressure on the finite pool of IPv4 addresses — how many organisations, data centres and ISPs are seeking IPv4 blocks for hosting, legacy support, VPNs, proxy services, or to ensure compatibility. Demand spikes when IPv6 adoption lags, legacy services remain IPv4-only, or new infrastructure requires routable IPv4 addresses.

Because IPv4 is a finite resource and globally exhausted, demand and supply drive a secondary market of IPv4 leasing, transfers, and brokerage. For platforms such as i.Lease, understanding which countries lead demand helps to price, allocate and manage inventory strategically.

Recent market analyses indicate that as demand remains elevated and supply tightens, the average cost of leasing IPv4 has remained stable but active — signalling on-going competition for address space, especially among small and mid-size providers.

Methodology: How we identify “top demand” countries

To compile the list of top IPv4–demand countries in 2025, we consider a combination of: global allocations, recent leasing and transfer data, market activity in IPv4 subnets, and regional hosting/ISP demand reflected in secondary-market metrics. We draw from public datasets of IPv4 allocation by country, and from market-trend reports covering leasing and trading activity.

While allocation doesn’t map perfectly to demand, high-allocation countries typically show higher utilisation, frequent subnet turnover, and larger private sector infrastructure — all indicators of demand. Secondary-market data helps highlight where demand continues to outpace supply.

The result: a current view of which countries are most aggressively seeking IPv4 resources in 2025.

#1 United States — still dominating IPv4 demand

The United States leads the world in IPv4 allocation and demand. With over 1.2 billion IPv4 addresses allocated, it accounts for a substantial share of global address space.

This allocation reflects both legacy assignments and ongoing demand. US-based data centres, content delivery networks, VPN providers, cloud hosting services and legacy enterprise systems all contribute to continuous demand for IPv4. The licensing and leasing market remains robust; smaller providers especially compete heavily for /24–/19 subnets, driving stable pricing and high utilisation.

For any organisation looking to acquire IPv4 via i.Lease, the US market remains critical — but also highly competitive. Clean, well-documented IPv4 blocks are in demand, and providers must be ready for rapid acquisition when subnets become available.

#2 China — rising demand amid growth and legacy constraints

China ranks second in total allocated IPv4 addresses: per global data, the country holds upwards of 350 million IPv4 addresses.

Though IPv6 adoption efforts have been ongoing, large parts of Chinese Internet infrastructure — especially legacy systems, enterprise networks, and hosting providers — remain IPv4-dependent. With continued expansion of online services, cloud hosting and mobile networks, demand remains strong.

Secondary-market data also shows active leasing and transfers involving Chinese entities, often seeking mid-size subnets to support new services. As IPv4 availability tightens globally, Chinese providers are increasingly turning to leasing platforms like i.Lease to satisfy demand.

#3 Japan — high allocation and constrained new supply

Japan holds a large share of global IPv4 allocations, with over 200 million addresses historically assigned.

With advanced infrastructure, high Internet penetration, and many legacy services, Japanese demand remains steady. Hosting providers, legacy enterprises, and ISPs maintaining legacy connectivity continue to require IPv4 blocks. Moreover, regional and global compliance requirements for some services mean IPv4 remains crucial.

As global IPv4 supply shrinks, Japanese demand is likely to drive more leasing and reuse of existing blocks — positioning Japan among the top demand countries in 2025.

#4 Germany — Europe’s demand focal point

Germany emerges as the highest-demand European country for IPv4. With more than 130 million addresses allocated, Germany has both historical legacy space and modern demand from data hosting, privacy-focused services, and enterprise infrastructure.

Market reports of IPv4 leasing and transfer activity show that European entities — including German firms — remain active, especially for smaller subnets suitable for regional hosting or content-delivery services.

Given regulatory requirements, data-residency needs, and demand for stable IPv4 connectivity for legacy clients, Germany represents a critical European hub in the IPv4 demand landscape.

An IP with a poor reputation can disrupt email delivery, block website access, and undermine customer trust. For businesses, this translates into lost revenue, failed customer acquisition, and operational bottlenecks—especially in sensitive industries like banking and healthcare. Repairing a damaged IP reputation is a time-consuming process involving malware removal, strengthened security, and improved sending practices. Even then, it can take weeks or months to fully restore trust, during which careful monitoring is essential to prevent further losses.

-Dr. Evelyn Shaw, Cybersecurity and Network Infrastructure Specialist

#5 United Kingdom — legacy allocations and ongoing need

Rounding out the top five is the United Kingdom, with over 120 million IPv4 addresses allocated historically.

Despite vigorous IPv6 promotion, many UK-based hosting providers, legacy enterprises and ISPs continue to depend heavily on IPv4. Because of global scarcity, acquisition of new IPv4 blocks is challenging — driving UK firms towards leasing and secondary-market solutions. Data indicates that UK entities rank among the top lessees in international IPv4 leasing platforms, especially for small-size subnets.

For organisations browsing i.Lease’s offerings, UK demand signals both opportunity and competition — making timing and clarity in leasing negotiations especially important.

Feature image for an article on IP Solutions, illustrating a complex digital network with overlapping layers. Key elements include icons representing IP Address Management (IPAM), IPv4/IPv6 transition, network security (firewalls/shields), and scalability, highlighting enhanced connectivity and business efficiency.

Why these countries dominate demand — structural factors

Legacy allocations and early infrastructure deployment  

Many of these nations received large IPv4 allocations during early internet growth phases. That historical advantage laid the groundwork for abundant legacy hardware, legacy services and large network footprints — all demanding IPv4 continuity.

 

High internet penetration and mature digital economies  

Countries with advanced economies, broad broadband penetration, cloud providers, content-delivery networks, and IoT deployments have higher IP needs. High-traffic services, hosting, streaming, VPNs and enterprise services all drive IPv4 demand.

 

Slow or partial IPv6 adoption  

In many regions, IPv6 adoption remains partial. Legacy services, enterprise environments, backward-compatible applications and client compatibility issues delay full migration — meaning IPv4 remains critical even in 2025.

 

Regulatory and compliance constraints  

Some services — especially those involving legacy clients, enterprise software, or compliance obligations — require stable IPv4 connectivity. This further sustains demand despite IPv6 availability.

 

What this means for i.Lease users and the global IPv4 market  

For users of i.Lease, knowing which countries lead IPv4 demand helps guide leasing and acquisition strategies. Because demand is concentrated in countries like the US, China, Japan, Germany and the UK, organisations seeking IPv4 blocks must expect competition — especially for small- to mid-size subnets, which are most versatile.

According to recent market reports, demand for /24–/22 subnets remains steady, driven by hosting providers, VPN and proxy services, and content-delivery networks.

As supply remains constrained, the leasing market is likely to stay active, prices may firm, and timing becomes critical. Users should prioritise clean, well-documented IPv4 blocks, avoid blacklisted ranges, and consider strategic hybrid models with IPv6 where possible.

For the global IPv4 market, these demand patterns highlight structural imbalance: a few countries continue to hold large allocations and high demand, while many regions — especially in developing economies — face legacy scarcity, limiting their ability to launch IPv4-dependent infrastructure

In today’s cloud landscape, providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud shape the reputation of IP addresses. While new IPs can start 'clean,' shared subnets mean the missteps of one user can impact many. To protect business operations, cloud users should prioritize dedicated IPs, maintain clean virtual machines, and actively monitor reputation shifts. Effective IP reputation management in the cloud demands vigilance, proactive measures, and continuous attention

– Alex Mercer, Cloud Security Specialist

Challenges and uncertainties in measuring IPv4 demand by country

While allocation and leasing data provide insight, “demand” remains hard to measure precisely. Allocation does not always reflect active use — some IPv4 blocks may sit unused, reserved, or unadvertised. A recent academic study found that active IPv4 addresses vary over time — with as much as 25% annual churn, reflecting dynamic reassignment, retirement, or reuse.

Moreover, the total number of unique devices behind each public IPv4 may vary — due to NAT, proxies, shared hosting or carrier-grade NAT (CGN). As one recent analysis by a major CDN noted, the global IPv4 count has stagnated, while IPv6 usage has grown — complicating demand-based forecasting.

Finally, external factors — regulatory changes, regional IPv6 push, pricing shifts, global trade rules — may rapidly shift demand, making any ranking of top-demand countries provisional rather than definitive.

Conclusion

In 2025, the countries with the highest demand for IPv4 remain largely those with historically large allocations and mature internet economies: the United States, China, Japan, Germany and the United Kingdom. Their demand is driven by legacy services, hosting providers, enterprise infrastructure and ongoing IPv4 dependence.

For users of i.Lease, this concentration of demand presents both opportunity and challenge. Clean, well-managed address blocks in these regions are valuable — but competitive. Timing, transparency, and due diligence matter more than ever.

As the IPv4 market continues to tighten and IPv6 adoption gradually increases, savvy organisations will treat IPv4 as a strategic but finite resource — leveraging leasing or acquisition where needed, but also planning for long-term infrastructure evolution.

Trusted IPv4 Leasing for Business Growth

Get enterprise-grade IPv4 space quickly, with seamless deployment and end-to-end management.

Get Started with i.lease

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Does “allocated IPv4 addresses” equal “active demand”?

Not always. Allocation indicates how many addresses are assigned to a country or registry, but many may be unused, reserved, or not publicly reachable. Studies show active IPv4 usage fluctuates significantly over time.

2. Why are some countries still so IPv4-heavy despite IPv6 availability?

Because legacy systems, client compatibility, enterprise services, and hosting requirements delay full IPv6 migration. IPv6 adoption remains uneven globally, so IPv4 remains critical for many environments.

3. How does leasing via a platform like i.Lease compare to buying IPv4 blocks?

Leasing offers flexibility, lower upfront cost, and access to blocks on demand — useful when supply is tight. Buying blocks carries higher cost and long-term commitment, but may provide stability. In 2025’s tight market, leasing remains popular for small and mid-size subnets.

4. Could developing countries challenge these top-demand countries soon?

Potentially — but only if IPv6 adoption rises significantly, or if global policies facilitate redistribution or leasing. Right now, IPv4 allocation imbalances and legacy infrastructure make catching up difficult.

5. How can businesses recover a damaged IP reputation?

Recovery starts by identifying and fixing the cause of the problem, such as removing malware or stopping spam. After cleanup, businesses request removal from blacklists and rebuild trust through steady, responsible sending and regular monitoring.

Related Blogs

Artículos relacionados

ipv4-leasing

Short-term vs long-term IPv4 leasing

Facing IPv4 shortages, companies must weigh cost, speed, and network growth when choosing a lease plan. Short-term leasing lets you scale resources up or down easily, but costs more over time and offers less supply certainty. Long-term leasing provides stable pricing and more reliable access, yet makes it harder to adjust your setup as needs evolve. Introduction: Why leasing IPv4 addresses makes sense IPv4 has evolved from a technicalRead more Related Posts Short-term vs long-term IPv4 leasing Facing IPv4 shortages, companies must weigh cost, speed, and network growth when choosing a lease plan.Short-term leasing lets you scale Read more Why IPv4 scarcity drives economic value for operators IPv4 地址曾经只是互联网运行所需的基础资源。但在今天,它越来越像一种具有市场价格、可交易、可租赁的数字资产。造成这一变化的原因并不复杂:IPv4 的总量有限,而全球互联网对 IPv4 的需求并没有消失;与此同时,IPv6 虽然早已出现,但迁移进度依然缓慢。这三股力量叠加,正在重新塑造运营商对 IP 地址的看法,也改变了互联网基础设施的经济逻辑。原文将这点概括为“有限供给、持续需求与缓慢转型”,并指出这正在推动 IP 地址成为影响全球电信经济的可交易资产。 IPv4 稀缺并不是新问题 全球互联网至今仍大量依赖 IPv4。这个协议诞生于更早的时代,只能提供大约 43 亿个地址。这个数量在互联网初期似乎足够庞大,但在今天已经明显不够。原文指出,IANA 在 2011 年就已将最后一批大型 IPv4 Read more How much does a /24 IPv4 block cost in 2026? IPv4 scarcity continues to shape internet infrastructure, with /24 blocks still trading actively on global markets despite growing IPv6 adoption. Key Read more .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }

ipv4

Why IPv4 scarcity drives economic value for operators

IPv4 地址曾经只是互联网运行所需的基础资源。但在今天,它越来越像一种具有市场价格、可交易、可租赁的数字资产。 造成这一变化的原因并不复杂:IPv4 的总量有限,而全球互联网对 IPv4 的需求并没有消失;与此同时,IPv6 虽然早已出现,但迁移进度依然缓慢。这三股力量叠加,正在重新塑造运营商对 IP 地址的看法,也改变了互联网基础设施的经济逻辑。原文将这点概括为“有限供给、持续需求与缓慢转型”,并指出这正在推动 IP 地址成为影响全球电信经济的可交易资产。 IPv4 稀缺并不是新问题 全球互联网至今仍大量依赖 IPv4。这个协议诞生于更早的时代,只能提供大约 43 亿个地址。这个数量在互联网初期似乎足够庞大,但在今天已经明显不够。原文指出,IANA 在 2011 年就已将最后一批大型 IPv4 地址区块分配给各区域注册机构,这成为互联网基础设施经济逻辑的转折点。   地址池耗尽之后,市场并没有停下来,而是开始适应。网络运营商、云服务商和电信企业不再只是把 IPv4 看成技术标识,而是把它视为一种有限资源,需要管理、分配、定价,甚至纳入财务优化的考量之中。 从技术资源走向经济资产 稀缺本身并不会自动带来价值,真正让 IPv4 变得有价值的,是它在现实世界中的持续需求。尽管 IPv6 已经存在,而且理论上更先进、地址空间也几乎无限,但大量旧系统、兼容性要求以及客户环境仍然依赖 IPv4。正因如此,IPv4 的需求并没有随着 IPv6 的出现而消失。原文将这一点称为一个“悖论”:技术上更优的替代方案已经存在,但 IPv4 依赖型系统的庞大存量仍在支撑市场需求。   供给固定、需求持续,这就形成了经典的供需失衡。文章提到,IPv4 的价格因此不断上升:2014 年约为每个地址 15 美元,近年则常见于 40 到 50 美元区间,高点甚至更高。围绕 IPv4 的语言也随之发生变化:从 allocation 走向 valuation,从 assignment 走向 trading。 价格不是固定的,但市场已经成形 IPv4 市场并不是静止不变的,也不是所有地址都一个价格。价格会受到区块大小、地区需求、宏观经济环境等因素影响。原文列出的历史数据表明,2014 年每个 IPv4 地址价格约在 6 到 24 美元之间,到 2021 年某些情况下可达到 60Read more Related Posts Short-term vs long-term IPv4 leasing Facing IPv4 shortages, companies must weigh cost, speed, and network growth when choosing a lease plan.Short-term leasing lets you scale Read more Why IPv4 scarcity drives economic value for operators IPv4 地址曾经只是互联网运行所需的基础资源。但在今天,它越来越像一种具有市场价格、可交易、可租赁的数字资产。造成这一变化的原因并不复杂:IPv4 的总量有限,而全球互联网对 IPv4 的需求并没有消失;与此同时,IPv6 虽然早已出现,但迁移进度依然缓慢。这三股力量叠加,正在重新塑造运营商对 IP 地址的看法,也改变了互联网基础设施的经济逻辑。原文将这点概括为“有限供给、持续需求与缓慢转型”,并指出这正在推动 IP 地址成为影响全球电信经济的可交易资产。 IPv4 稀缺并不是新问题 全球互联网至今仍大量依赖 IPv4。这个协议诞生于更早的时代,只能提供大约 43 亿个地址。这个数量在互联网初期似乎足够庞大,但在今天已经明显不够。原文指出,IANA 在 2011 年就已将最后一批大型 IPv4 Read more How much does a /24 IPv4 block cost in 2026? IPv4 scarcity continues to shape internet infrastructure, with /24 blocks still trading actively on global markets despite growing IPv6 adoption. Key Read more .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }

ipv4-pricing

What Determines IPv4 Pricing in Today’s Market?

Scarcity, shifting demand, and leasing platforms such as i.lease are reshaping how IPv4 addresses are valued and traded globally. IPv4 pricing is driven primarily by scarcity, block size, and fluctuating demand across regions and industries. Leasing models, including platforms like i.lease, are stabilising costs amid volatile purchase markets. What determines IPv4 pricing in today’s market A market shaped by scarcity IPv4 addresses, once freely allocated, have become a traded digital commodity. AsRead more Related Posts Short-term vs long-term IPv4 leasing Facing IPv4 shortages, companies must weigh cost, speed, and network growth when choosing a lease plan.Short-term leasing lets you scale Read more Why IPv4 scarcity drives economic value for operators IPv4 地址曾经只是互联网运行所需的基础资源。但在今天,它越来越像一种具有市场价格、可交易、可租赁的数字资产。造成这一变化的原因并不复杂:IPv4 的总量有限,而全球互联网对 IPv4 的需求并没有消失;与此同时,IPv6 虽然早已出现,但迁移进度依然缓慢。这三股力量叠加,正在重新塑造运营商对 IP 地址的看法,也改变了互联网基础设施的经济逻辑。原文将这点概括为“有限供给、持续需求与缓慢转型”,并指出这正在推动 IP 地址成为影响全球电信经济的可交易资产。 IPv4 稀缺并不是新问题 全球互联网至今仍大量依赖 IPv4。这个协议诞生于更早的时代,只能提供大约 43 亿个地址。这个数量在互联网初期似乎足够庞大,但在今天已经明显不够。原文指出,IANA 在 2011 年就已将最后一批大型 IPv4 Read more How much does a /24 IPv4 block cost in 2026? IPv4 scarcity continues to shape internet infrastructure, with /24 blocks still trading actively on global markets despite growing IPv6 adoption. Key Read more .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }