Top 5 countries with the Highest IPv4 Demand in 2025
Stephanie
Standfirst — As IPv4 remains scarce, some nations show particularly strong demand for legacy IP resources. Knowing which helps guide leasing or acquisition strategies.
Table of Contents
- The United States, China, Japan, Germany and the UK are the top nations demanding IPv4, reflecting both legacy allocation and continuing pressure to support IPv4-only services.
- For organisations using i.Lease, focusing on these high-demand markets is key — competition is fierce, but so is the value of clean, compliant IPv4 space.
What “IPv4 demand” means — and why it matters
When we talk about “IPv4 demand,” we refer to the pressure on the finite pool of IPv4 addresses — how many organisations, data centres and ISPs are seeking IPv4 blocks for hosting, legacy support, VPNs, proxy services, or to ensure compatibility. Demand spikes when IPv6 adoption lags, legacy services remain IPv4-only, or new infrastructure requires routable IPv4 addresses.
Because IPv4 is a finite resource and globally exhausted, demand and supply drive a secondary market of IPv4 leasing, transfers, and brokerage. For platforms such as i.Lease, understanding which countries lead demand helps to price, allocate and manage inventory strategically.
Recent market analyses indicate that as demand remains elevated and supply tightens, the average cost of leasing IPv4 has remained stable but active — signalling on-going competition for address space, especially among small and mid-size providers.
Methodology: How we identify “top demand” countries
To compile the list of top IPv4–demand countries in 2025, we consider a combination of: global allocations, recent leasing and transfer data, market activity in IPv4 subnets, and regional hosting/ISP demand reflected in secondary-market metrics. We draw from public datasets of IPv4 allocation by country, and from market-trend reports covering leasing and trading activity.
While allocation doesn’t map perfectly to demand, high-allocation countries typically show higher utilisation, frequent subnet turnover, and larger private sector infrastructure — all indicators of demand. Secondary-market data helps highlight where demand continues to outpace supply.
The result: a current view of which countries are most aggressively seeking IPv4 resources in 2025.
#1 United States — still dominating IPv4 demand
The United States leads the world in IPv4 allocation and demand. With over 1.2 billion IPv4 addresses allocated, it accounts for a substantial share of global address space.
This allocation reflects both legacy assignments and ongoing demand. US-based data centres, content delivery networks, VPN providers, cloud hosting services and legacy enterprise systems all contribute to continuous demand for IPv4. The licensing and leasing market remains robust; smaller providers especially compete heavily for /24–/19 subnets, driving stable pricing and high utilisation.
For any organisation looking to acquire IPv4 via i.Lease, the US market remains critical — but also highly competitive. Clean, well-documented IPv4 blocks are in demand, and providers must be ready for rapid acquisition when subnets become available.
#2 China — rising demand amid growth and legacy constraints
China ranks second in total allocated IPv4 addresses: per global data, the country holds upwards of 350 million IPv4 addresses.
Though IPv6 adoption efforts have been ongoing, large parts of Chinese Internet infrastructure — especially legacy systems, enterprise networks, and hosting providers — remain IPv4-dependent. With continued expansion of online services, cloud hosting and mobile networks, demand remains strong.
Secondary-market data also shows active leasing and transfers involving Chinese entities, often seeking mid-size subnets to support new services. As IPv4 availability tightens globally, Chinese providers are increasingly turning to leasing platforms like i.Lease to satisfy demand.
#3 Japan — high allocation and constrained new supply
Japan holds a large share of global IPv4 allocations, with over 200 million addresses historically assigned.
With advanced infrastructure, high Internet penetration, and many legacy services, Japanese demand remains steady. Hosting providers, legacy enterprises, and ISPs maintaining legacy connectivity continue to require IPv4 blocks. Moreover, regional and global compliance requirements for some services mean IPv4 remains crucial.
As global IPv4 supply shrinks, Japanese demand is likely to drive more leasing and reuse of existing blocks — positioning Japan among the top demand countries in 2025.
#4 Germany — Europe’s demand focal point
Germany emerges as the highest-demand European country for IPv4. With more than 130 million addresses allocated, Germany has both historical legacy space and modern demand from data hosting, privacy-focused services, and enterprise infrastructure.
Market reports of IPv4 leasing and transfer activity show that European entities — including German firms — remain active, especially for smaller subnets suitable for regional hosting or content-delivery services.
Given regulatory requirements, data-residency needs, and demand for stable IPv4 connectivity for legacy clients, Germany represents a critical European hub in the IPv4 demand landscape.
An IP with a poor reputation can disrupt email delivery, block website access, and undermine customer trust. For businesses, this translates into lost revenue, failed customer acquisition, and operational bottlenecks—especially in sensitive industries like banking and healthcare. Repairing a damaged IP reputation is a time-consuming process involving malware removal, strengthened security, and improved sending practices. Even then, it can take weeks or months to fully restore trust, during which careful monitoring is essential to prevent further losses.
-Dr. Evelyn Shaw, Cybersecurity and Network Infrastructure Specialist
#5 United Kingdom — legacy allocations and ongoing need
Rounding out the top five is the United Kingdom, with over 120 million IPv4 addresses allocated historically.
Despite vigorous IPv6 promotion, many UK-based hosting providers, legacy enterprises and ISPs continue to depend heavily on IPv4. Because of global scarcity, acquisition of new IPv4 blocks is challenging — driving UK firms towards leasing and secondary-market solutions. Data indicates that UK entities rank among the top lessees in international IPv4 leasing platforms, especially for small-size subnets.
For organisations browsing i.Lease’s offerings, UK demand signals both opportunity and competition — making timing and clarity in leasing negotiations especially important.
Why these countries dominate demand — structural factors
Legacy allocations and early infrastructure deployment
Many of these nations received large IPv4 allocations during early internet growth phases. That historical advantage laid the groundwork for abundant legacy hardware, legacy services and large network footprints — all demanding IPv4 continuity.
High internet penetration and mature digital economies
Countries with advanced economies, broad broadband penetration, cloud providers, content-delivery networks, and IoT deployments have higher IP needs. High-traffic services, hosting, streaming, VPNs and enterprise services all drive IPv4 demand.
Slow or partial IPv6 adoption
In many regions, IPv6 adoption remains partial. Legacy services, enterprise environments, backward-compatible applications and client compatibility issues delay full migration — meaning IPv4 remains critical even in 2025.
Regulatory and compliance constraints
Some services — especially those involving legacy clients, enterprise software, or compliance obligations — require stable IPv4 connectivity. This further sustains demand despite IPv6 availability.
What this means for i.Lease users and the global IPv4 market
For users of i.Lease, knowing which countries lead IPv4 demand helps guide leasing and acquisition strategies. Because demand is concentrated in countries like the US, China, Japan, Germany and the UK, organisations seeking IPv4 blocks must expect competition — especially for small- to mid-size subnets, which are most versatile.
According to recent market reports, demand for /24–/22 subnets remains steady, driven by hosting providers, VPN and proxy services, and content-delivery networks.
As supply remains constrained, the leasing market is likely to stay active, prices may firm, and timing becomes critical. Users should prioritise clean, well-documented IPv4 blocks, avoid blacklisted ranges, and consider strategic hybrid models with IPv6 where possible.
For the global IPv4 market, these demand patterns highlight structural imbalance: a few countries continue to hold large allocations and high demand, while many regions — especially in developing economies — face legacy scarcity, limiting their ability to launch IPv4-dependent infrastructure
In today’s cloud landscape, providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud shape the reputation of IP addresses. While new IPs can start 'clean,' shared subnets mean the missteps of one user can impact many. To protect business operations, cloud users should prioritize dedicated IPs, maintain clean virtual machines, and actively monitor reputation shifts. Effective IP reputation management in the cloud demands vigilance, proactive measures, and continuous attention
– Alex Mercer, Cloud Security Specialist
Challenges and uncertainties in measuring IPv4 demand by country
While allocation and leasing data provide insight, “demand” remains hard to measure precisely. Allocation does not always reflect active use — some IPv4 blocks may sit unused, reserved, or unadvertised. A recent academic study found that active IPv4 addresses vary over time — with as much as 25% annual churn, reflecting dynamic reassignment, retirement, or reuse.
Moreover, the total number of unique devices behind each public IPv4 may vary — due to NAT, proxies, shared hosting or carrier-grade NAT (CGN). As one recent analysis by a major CDN noted, the global IPv4 count has stagnated, while IPv6 usage has grown — complicating demand-based forecasting.
Finally, external factors — regulatory changes, regional IPv6 push, pricing shifts, global trade rules — may rapidly shift demand, making any ranking of top-demand countries provisional rather than definitive.
Conclusion
In 2025, the countries with the highest demand for IPv4 remain largely those with historically large allocations and mature internet economies: the United States, China, Japan, Germany and the United Kingdom. Their demand is driven by legacy services, hosting providers, enterprise infrastructure and ongoing IPv4 dependence.
For users of i.Lease, this concentration of demand presents both opportunity and challenge. Clean, well-managed address blocks in these regions are valuable — but competitive. Timing, transparency, and due diligence matter more than ever.
As the IPv4 market continues to tighten and IPv6 adoption gradually increases, savvy organisations will treat IPv4 as a strategic but finite resource — leveraging leasing or acquisition where needed, but also planning for long-term infrastructure evolution.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Does “allocated IPv4 addresses” equal “active demand”?
Not always. Allocation indicates how many addresses are assigned to a country or registry, but many may be unused, reserved, or not publicly reachable. Studies show active IPv4 usage fluctuates significantly over time.
2. Why are some countries still so IPv4-heavy despite IPv6 availability?
Because legacy systems, client compatibility, enterprise services, and hosting requirements delay full IPv6 migration. IPv6 adoption remains uneven globally, so IPv4 remains critical for many environments.
3. How does leasing via a platform like i.Lease compare to buying IPv4 blocks?
Leasing offers flexibility, lower upfront cost, and access to blocks on demand — useful when supply is tight. Buying blocks carries higher cost and long-term commitment, but may provide stability. In 2025’s tight market, leasing remains popular for small and mid-size subnets.
4. Could developing countries challenge these top-demand countries soon?
Potentially — but only if IPv6 adoption rises significantly, or if global policies facilitate redistribution or leasing. Right now, IPv4 allocation imbalances and legacy infrastructure make catching up difficult.
5. How can businesses recover a damaged IP reputation?
Recovery starts by identifying and fixing the cause of the problem, such as removing malware or stopping spam. After cleanup, businesses request removal from blacklists and rebuild trust through steady, responsible sending and regular monitoring.
Related Posts
What Is Network Abuse? Handling Abuse Reports for Your IP Space
Network abuse is the use of IP address space to conduct harmful activity spam, phishing, malware distribution, brute-force attacks, scanning, or participating in attacks and abuse reports are the notifications sent to whoever is responsible for that space when it happens. Those reports arrive at the abuse contact registered for the address block, which means they arrive at you if you hold or manage the space, regardless of whoRead more Related Posts 您需要多少 IPv4 地址空间？IP 地址块大小（/24、/23、/22、/21、/20）与容量规划指南 大多数企业在规划 IPv4 地址空间时，应从 /24 开始——这是全球互联网能够可靠路由的最小地址块——然后根据实际服务所消耗的地址数量以及未来增长空间逐步扩大。 一个 /24 提供 256 个地址；每增加一个级别，地址数量大约翻倍。合适的地址块大小，应能够覆盖您真实的地址使用量和近期增长，同时避免让您为大量无法合理说明或实际使用的地址空间付费。 在租赁或购买 IPv4 时，这个问题经常出现，而且通常还伴随着另一个问题：像 /24、/22 或 /20 这样的标记到底是什么意思？本指南会同时回答这两个问题。它会说明每种常见地址块大小包含多少个地址、适合哪些使用场景，并提供一个实用框架，帮助您将实际服务需求转换为合适的地址块大小。目标是让您做出一个能够向注册管理机构、财务团队以及内部容量规划团队合理解释的决定，而不是凭猜测选择一个过小或过度配置的地址块。 这是一篇关于容量规划和地址块大小选择的指南，而不是子网划分教程。如果您想了解地址块如何划分，以及 CIDR 标记在位级别上如何工作，请参考我们专门的 IP地址租赁中的授权书 (LOA) 是什么？LOA 与 ROA 的区别以及需要核实的内容 授权书（Letter of Authorization，LOA）是一份正式文件，由 IP 地址块的注册持有者授权另一方通过指定的自治系统编号（ASN）公告该地址空间。 它是一份书面授权，将使用地址空间的合同权利与实际进行路由公告的技术行为连接起来——如果没有 LOA，上游服务提供商通常会拒绝接受你的路由公告。 正是这种拒绝，使 LOA 在运营上具有决定性意义，而不仅仅是一项行政文件。Transit 服务提供商、数据中心和电信运营商都需要证明，公告某个前缀的一方确实获得了授权，因为接受未经授权的公告就意味着参与了一次路由劫持。Cloudflare 的 BYOIP 文档对此说明得非常明确：其 Transit 服务提供商要求在接受 Cloudflare 代表客户公告的路由之前提供 LOA，而且文件必须明确列出获得授权的前缀以及将用于公告这些前缀的 ASN。整个行业普遍都有类似要求。一家企业即使已经签署租赁协议、完成路由器配置，仍然可能因为 IPv4 地址总共有多少个？43 亿个地址详解 在 32 位 IPv4 地址空间中，理论上总共有 4,294,967,296 个可能的 IPv4 地址。 这个数字来自 232，因为一个 IPv4 地址包含 32 个二进制位。然而，42.9 亿并不意味着有 42.9 亿个地址可用于普通的公共互联网。IPv4 地址空间中的很大一部分被保留用于私有网络、回环通信、多播、共享地址空间、文档、基准测试、协议功能以及其他特殊用途。剩余的全球可用地址空间，在互联网发展历史中也已经被大量分配。IPv4 地址总量与可公开使用的 .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }
What Happens to IPv4 Records After an IP Address Transfer?
Completing an IPv4 transfer does more than move address space from one organization to another. It changes the administrative relationship around the IPv4 block—and that can affect multiple records and services associated with the resource. After an IPv4 transfer, organizations may need to review or update: RIR registration records WHOIS and RDAP information Organization and contact details Abuse contacts RPKI certificates and ROAs Internet Routing Registry (IRR) objects ReverseRead more Related Posts 您需要多少 IPv4 地址空间？IP 地址块大小（/24、/23、/22、/21、/20）与容量规划指南 大多数企业在规划 IPv4 地址空间时，应从 /24 开始——这是全球互联网能够可靠路由的最小地址块——然后根据实际服务所消耗的地址数量以及未来增长空间逐步扩大。 一个 /24 提供 256 个地址；每增加一个级别，地址数量大约翻倍。合适的地址块大小，应能够覆盖您真实的地址使用量和近期增长，同时避免让您为大量无法合理说明或实际使用的地址空间付费。 在租赁或购买 IPv4 时，这个问题经常出现，而且通常还伴随着另一个问题：像 /24、/22 或 /20 这样的标记到底是什么意思？本指南会同时回答这两个问题。它会说明每种常见地址块大小包含多少个地址、适合哪些使用场景，并提供一个实用框架，帮助您将实际服务需求转换为合适的地址块大小。目标是让您做出一个能够向注册管理机构、财务团队以及内部容量规划团队合理解释的决定，而不是凭猜测选择一个过小或过度配置的地址块。 这是一篇关于容量规划和地址块大小选择的指南，而不是子网划分教程。如果您想了解地址块如何划分，以及 CIDR 标记在位级别上如何工作，请参考我们专门的 What Happens to IPv4 Records After an IP Address Transfer? Completing an IPv4 transfer does more than move address space from one organization to another. It changes the administrative relationship Qu’est-ce qu’une lettre d’autorisation (LOA) dans le cadre d’un bail de propriété intellectuelle ? LOA vs ROA et points à vérifier Une Lettre d’Autorisation (LOA) est un document officiel dans lequel le titulaire enregistré d’un bloc d’adresses IP autorise une autre .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }
What Is a Letter of Authorization (LOA) in IP Leasing? LOA vs ROA and What to Verify
A Letter of Authorization (LOA) is a formal document in which the registered holder of an IP address block authorizes another party to announce that address space from a specified Autonomous System Number. It is the written permission that connects a contractual right to use address space with the technical act of routing it — and without it, upstream providers will generally refuse to accept your announcements. That refusalRead more Related Posts De combien d’espace IPv4 avez-vous besoin ? Tailles de blocs (/24, /23, /22, /21, /20) et guide de dimensionnement La plupart des entreprises devraient dimensionner leur espace IPv4 en commençant par un /24 — le plus petit bloc que What Happens to IPv4 Records After an IP Address Transfer? Completing an IPv4 transfer does more than move address space from one organization to another. It changes the administrative relationship IP地址租赁中的授权书 (LOA) 是什么？LOA 与 ROA 的区别以及需要核实的内容 授权书（Letter of Authorization，LOA）是一份正式文件，由 IP 地址块的注册持有者授权另一方通过指定的自治系统编号（ASN）公告该地址空间。 它是一份书面授权，将使用地址空间的合同权利与实际进行路由公告的技术行为连接起来——如果没有 LOA，上游服务提供商通常会拒绝接受你的路由公告。 正是这种拒绝，使 LOA 在运营上具有决定性意义，而不仅仅是一项行政文件。Transit 服务提供商、数据中心和电信运营商都需要证明，公告某个前缀的一方确实获得了授权，因为接受未经授权的公告就意味着参与了一次路由劫持。Cloudflare 的 BYOIP 文档对此说明得非常明确：其 Transit 服务提供商要求在接受 Cloudflare 代表客户公告的路由之前提供 LOA，而且文件必须明确列出获得授权的前缀以及将用于公告这些前缀的 ASN。整个行业普遍都有类似要求。一家企业即使已经签署租赁协议、完成路由器配置，仍然可能因为 .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }
