The future of IPv4 Markets

Despite IPv6 expansion, scarcity keeps IPv4 valuable, sustaining a global secondary market where addresses increasingly function as tradable digital assets.
Table of Contents
- Finite IPv4 supply has created a mature secondary market where address blocks are bought, sold and leased worldwide.
- Prices fluctuate, but persistent demand from cloud, hosting and AI infrastructure suggests IPv4 markets will remain active for years.
What happened
The rise of a digital commodity
The global market for IPv4 addresses is entering a new phase. Once treated as a technical resource distributed freely by internet registries, IPv4 addresses are now traded, leased and managed as scarce digital assets.
The shift is a consequence of a simple structural fact: the IPv4 protocol only supports roughly 4.3 billion unique addresses, and the global free pool has effectively been exhausted. As demand for internet connectivity expanded—from smartphones and cloud computing to IoT devices—the available supply dwindled.
Today, companies that require additional addresses often obtain them through transfers or secondary marketplaces rather than direct allocation from registries. The result is a global market in which address blocks can be valued, traded and even used as financial instruments.
According to industry data, IPv4 addresses have evolved from negligible infrastructure components into a recognised commodity. Analysts note that organisations can now generate significant returns from previously unused address allocations, with blocks sometimes worth millions of dollars depending on size and reputation.
The emergence of brokers and marketplaces—including services such as those provided by Larus and similar trading platforms—illustrates how the internet’s addressing system has become entwined with modern digital economics.
How IPv4 became a tradable asset
The concept of an IP address market would have seemed improbable in the early internet. For decades, organisations received large blocks of addresses from regional internet registries (RIRs) with little cost and minimal oversight.
However, the exhaustion of the IPv4 pool changed that dynamic.
Once new allocations were no longer available, demand began shifting toward transfers between organisations. Companies that possessed unused address blocks—often universities, early internet service providers or legacy technology firms—suddenly held assets that other organisations needed to operate and expand.
Industry reports show how dramatically values have changed. In 2014, IPv4 addresses traded for roughly $15 per address on average. Within five years prices doubled to around $30, and by 2021–2022 some transactions exceeded $45–$60 per address.
As one brokerage executive explained in an industry analysis, IPv4 addresses have effectively become “a commodity” in the digital infrastructure economy.
This transformation has reshaped how organisations manage their network resources. Instead of being treated as technical identifiers alone, IPv4 allocations now appear on balance sheets as assets that can be monetised.
The structure of the IPv4 market
The modern IPv4 ecosystem consists of several interlocking elements:
Regional Internet Registries (RIRs)
Organisations such as ARIN, RIPE NCC and APNIC regulate address allocation and oversee transfers within their regions.
Brokers and marketplaces
Specialist intermediaries facilitate transactions, helping buyers find available blocks and ensuring compliance with registry policies.
Secondary buyers
Cloud providers, hosting companies, telecom operators and data platforms are the primary purchasers of IPv4 resources.
The transfer process itself resembles a regulated asset transaction. Buyers must justify their need for addresses and comply with registry requirements, while brokers often provide escrow services and verification to minimise fraud risks.
In parallel, a leasing market has emerged. Rather than selling addresses outright, organisations can rent unused IPv4 blocks to generate recurring revenue streams.
Demand drivers behind the IPv4 market
Although IPv6—the successor protocol with vastly larger address capacity—has existed for decades, IPv4 demand remains persistent.
Several structural factors explain why.
Cloud infrastructure expansion
Large-scale cloud platforms and hosting providers still rely heavily on IPv4 compatibility to serve the majority of global internet traffic.
Because many networks operate in dual-stack environments—supporting both IPv4 and IPv6 simultaneously—additional IPv4 capacity is often necessary even as IPv6 adoption grows.
Legacy systems
Millions of devices, applications and network services continue to rely on IPv4 compatibility. Replacing or upgrading these systems can be expensive and time-consuming, delaying the transition to IPv6-only infrastructure.
Internet growth
The number of connected devices worldwide continues to increase. Even with technologies such as Network Address Translation (NAT), providers still require public IPv4 addresses for certain services and applications.
For cloud providers and ISPs, the scarcity of IPv4 addresses has therefore become a direct cost factor. Organisations planning new infrastructure deployments must often budget specifically for IP resources.
Price volatility and market cycles
Despite long-term scarcity, the IPv4 market has recently experienced price volatility.
Industry reports from 2024 and 2025 indicate that the average price per address declined in some segments, particularly for larger address blocks. In some cases, large blocks fell from more than $50 per address to around $20.
However, the decline does not necessarily signal weakening demand.
Transaction volumes have increased as more organisations participate in the secondary market, suggesting that IPv4 trading has matured into a stable asset class rather than a speculative bubble.
In other words, the market may be shifting from rapid price growth toward a more predictable cycle shaped by supply, demand and registry policies.
-IPv4 is the Internet’s most important service enabler; a device or server cannot be online without it.
– Heng.Lu, CEO of LARUS Limited and founder of the LARUS Foundation
IPv4 leasing and financialisation
Another trend reshaping the market is IPv4 leasing.
Instead of permanently transferring address blocks, organisations increasingly lease them for defined periods. Leasing allows address holders to generate recurring income while retaining ownership of their resources.
Research into leasing platforms suggests that monthly leasing prices can average around $0.47–$0.53 per address depending on the marketplace and block size.
For enterprises with large historical allocations, this creates a new revenue stream. For buyers, leasing provides flexibility when scaling infrastructure quickly without committing to permanent purchases.
As a result, IPv4 resources are gradually being treated similarly to digital real estate: assets that can be rented, traded or leveraged depending on operational needs.
The role of brokers and marketplaces
The complexity of IPv4 transfers has led to the rise of specialised intermediaries.
Brokers perform several critical functions:
- locating available address blocks
- verifying ownership and reputation of addresses
- ensuring compliance with RIR transfer policies
- managing escrow and legal documentation
Without such intermediaries, the risk of fraud, compliance violations or purchasing compromised address blocks would be significantly higher.
Marketplaces also improve transparency by reporting transaction volumes and price trends, allowing organisations to evaluate when to buy or lease addresses.
Platforms such as Larus operate within this ecosystem, connecting buyers and sellers in an increasingly competitive market.
Will IPv6 eventually replace the IPv4 market?
IPv6 adoption is steadily increasing, and the protocol’s enormous address space theoretically removes the scarcity problem entirely.
Yet the IPv4 market is unlikely to disappear quickly.
Many networks will operate in dual-stack configurations for years, and full migration to IPv6-only environments remains complex. As long as IPv4 compatibility is required for global connectivity, demand for address space will persist.
Industry analysts therefore expect IPv4 markets to remain active throughout the transition period, even as IPv6 adoption accelerates.
The market may ultimately shrink as IPv6 becomes dominant, but the timeline could extend well into the next decade.
Structural implications for the internet
The emergence of a global IPv4 trading market reveals deeper structural tensions within internet governance.
On one hand, the secondary market provides flexibility and efficiency, enabling organisations to obtain address resources when needed.
On the other hand, it introduces economic inequality into a system originally designed as a shared technical resource.
Early internet adopters that received large allocations decades ago now hold valuable digital assets, while newer companies must purchase or lease address space in competitive markets.
This shift highlights how infrastructure decisions made in the early internet era continue to shape today’s digital economy.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is IPv4?
IPv4 (Internet Protocol version 4) is the original addressing system used to identify devices on the internet, providing about 4.3 billion unique addresses.
2. Why is IPv4 still valuable?
The global pool of IPv4 addresses is effectively exhausted, and many networks still require IPv4 compatibility. This scarcity has created a secondary market where addresses can be bought, sold or leased.
3. How much does an IPv4 address cost?
Prices vary depending on block size and market conditions. Historically, addresses have traded between roughly $30 and $60 per address, although prices fluctuate with supply and demand.
4. What is an IPv4 broker?
An IPv4 broker is an intermediary that facilitates address transfers between buyers and sellers, ensuring compliance with registry rules and helping manage transaction risks.
5. Will IPv6 eliminate the IPv4 market?
Eventually, widespread IPv6 adoption may reduce the need for IPv4 trading. However, dual-stack networks and legacy systems mean IPv4 demand is likely to persist for many years.
Related Blogs
Related Posts

Why most enterprises are accidentally exposed to IPv4 allocation failure risk
IPv4 scarcity is widely understood. What many enterprises still underestimate is the continuity risk surrounding how address resources are governed and maintained. Enterprises often maintain operational use of IPv4 resources without full visibility into the continuity conditions supporting those allocations. The growing reliance on leasing, transfers, and provider-managed infrastructure is reshaping IPv4 Allocation into a long-term governance issue. IPv4 Allocation has quietly become a continuity issue For many enterpriseRead more Related Posts Risques liés au renouvellement d’IPv4 : quand le manque de responsabilisation se transforme en trahison du code en cours d’exécution La plupart des entreprises entrent sur le marché IPv4 avec un objectif simple. Elles ont besoin d’adresses. Peut-être en ont-elles Read more 大多数企业为何会意外面临 IPv4 地址分配失败的风险 IPv4 稀缺性已被广泛理解。许多企业仍然低估的是:地址资源如何被治理和维护所带来的连续性风险。 企业往往在持续使用 IPv4 资源的同时,并没有完全看清支撑这些分配的连续性条件。 对租赁、转让和供应商管理型基础设施的依赖不断增加,正在将 IPv4地址分配 重塑为一个长期治理问题。 IPv4地址分配已悄然成为连续性问题 对许多企业 IT 团队来说,IPv4 地址看起来仍然在运营上保持稳定。 应用程序仍然可以访问。云平台继续扩展。连接服务供应商在没有明显中断的情况下提供服务。从外部看,互联网似乎仍像过去一样运行。 然而,在这种运营稳定性之下,IPv4地址分配的结构已经发生了根本变化。 可自由分配的 IPv4 空间耗尽早已不是新闻。American Registry for Read more Why i.lease Exists: IPv4 Continuity Is Not Commodity Access Most businesses enter the IPv4 market with a simple goal. They need addresses. Maybe they need them for hosting.Maybe they Read more .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }

Why i.lease Exists: IPv4 Continuity Is Not Commodity Access
Most businesses enter the IPv4 market with a simple goal. They need addresses. Maybe they need them for hosting.Maybe they need them for VPN infrastructure.Maybe they need them for cloud services, SaaS platforms, telecom expansion, email systems, cybersecurity tools, or customer-facing applications. So they search for an IPv4 provider. They compare prices. They check block sizes. They ask how fast delivery can happen. They look for a seller, broker,Read more Related Posts Por qué la mayoría de las empresas están expuestas accidentalmente al riesgo de fallo en la asignación de IPv4 La escasez de IPv4 es ampliamente comprendida. Lo que muchas empresas aún subestiman es el riesgo de continuidad relacionado con Read more Pourquoi la plupart des entreprises sont exposées accidentellement au risque d’échec d’attribution d’adresse IPv4 La rareté de l’IPv4 est largement comprise. Ce que de nombreuses entreprises sous-estiment encore, c’est le risque de continuité lié Read more i.lease 存在的意义:IPv4 连续性并非普通的接入方式 大多数企业进入 IPv4 市场时,目标都很简单。 它们需要地址。 也许是用于托管。 也许是用于 VPN 基础设施。 也许是用于云服务、SaaS 平台、电信扩展、电子邮件系统、网络安全工具,或面向客户的应用程序。 于是,它们开始寻找 IPv4 供应商。 它们比较价格,检查地址块大小,询问交付速度,寻找能够提供所需地址数量的卖方、经纪商或租赁平台。 这种做法可以理解。 但它并不完整。 因为 IPv4 访问不只是供应问题。 它是一个连续性问题。 Read more .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }

Running-Code Primacy: Why IPv4 Leasing Should Be Judged by Operational Proof
IPv4 leasing often begins with a simple question: Can this provider give us the addresses? But for businesses that depend on IPv4 for hosting, VPN, SaaS, cloud, telecom, security, email delivery, or customer-facing platforms, that question is not enough. A better question is: Can this IPv4 structure prove that it works operationally? That is where Running-Code Primacy matters. Running-Code Primacy means that live operational reality should come before institutionalRead more Related Posts Risques liés au renouvellement d’IPv4 : quand le manque de responsabilisation se transforme en trahison du code en cours d’exécution La plupart des entreprises entrent sur le marché IPv4 avec un objectif simple. Elles ont besoin d’adresses. Peut-être en ont-elles Read more i.lease 存在的意义:IPv4 连续性并非普通的接入方式 大多数企业进入 IPv4 市场时,目标都很简单。 它们需要地址。 也许是用于托管。 也许是用于 VPN 基础设施。 也许是用于云服务、SaaS 平台、电信扩展、电子邮件系统、网络安全工具,或面向客户的应用程序。 于是,它们开始寻找 IPv4 供应商。 它们比较价格,检查地址块大小,询问交付速度,寻找能够提供所需地址数量的卖方、经纪商或租赁平台。 这种做法可以理解。 但它并不完整。 因为 IPv4 访问不只是供应问题。 它是一个连续性问题。 Read more Why most enterprises are accidentally exposed to IPv4 allocation failure risk IPv4 scarcity is widely understood. What many enterprises still underestimate is the continuity risk surrounding how address resources are governed Read more .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }