Top 5 countries with the Highest IPv4 Demand in 2025
Stephanie
Standfirst — As IPv4 remains scarce, some nations show particularly strong demand for legacy IP resources. Knowing which helps guide leasing or acquisition strategies.
Table of Contents
- The United States, China, Japan, Germany and the UK are the top nations demanding IPv4, reflecting both legacy allocation and continuing pressure to support IPv4-only services.
- For organisations using i.Lease, focusing on these high-demand markets is key — competition is fierce, but so is the value of clean, compliant IPv4 space.
What “IPv4 demand” means — and why it matters
When we talk about “IPv4 demand,” we refer to the pressure on the finite pool of IPv4 addresses — how many organisations, data centres and ISPs are seeking IPv4 blocks for hosting, legacy support, VPNs, proxy services, or to ensure compatibility. Demand spikes when IPv6 adoption lags, legacy services remain IPv4-only, or new infrastructure requires routable IPv4 addresses.
Because IPv4 is a finite resource and globally exhausted, demand and supply drive a secondary market of IPv4 leasing, transfers, and brokerage. For platforms such as i.Lease, understanding which countries lead demand helps to price, allocate and manage inventory strategically.
Recent market analyses indicate that as demand remains elevated and supply tightens, the average cost of leasing IPv4 has remained stable but active — signalling on-going competition for address space, especially among small and mid-size providers.
Methodology: How we identify “top demand” countries
To compile the list of top IPv4–demand countries in 2025, we consider a combination of: global allocations, recent leasing and transfer data, market activity in IPv4 subnets, and regional hosting/ISP demand reflected in secondary-market metrics. We draw from public datasets of IPv4 allocation by country, and from market-trend reports covering leasing and trading activity.
While allocation doesn’t map perfectly to demand, high-allocation countries typically show higher utilisation, frequent subnet turnover, and larger private sector infrastructure — all indicators of demand. Secondary-market data helps highlight where demand continues to outpace supply.
The result: a current view of which countries are most aggressively seeking IPv4 resources in 2025.
#1 United States — still dominating IPv4 demand
The United States leads the world in IPv4 allocation and demand. With over 1.2 billion IPv4 addresses allocated, it accounts for a substantial share of global address space.
This allocation reflects both legacy assignments and ongoing demand. US-based data centres, content delivery networks, VPN providers, cloud hosting services and legacy enterprise systems all contribute to continuous demand for IPv4. The licensing and leasing market remains robust; smaller providers especially compete heavily for /24–/19 subnets, driving stable pricing and high utilisation.
For any organisation looking to acquire IPv4 via i.Lease, the US market remains critical — but also highly competitive. Clean, well-documented IPv4 blocks are in demand, and providers must be ready for rapid acquisition when subnets become available.
#2 China — rising demand amid growth and legacy constraints
China ranks second in total allocated IPv4 addresses: per global data, the country holds upwards of 350 million IPv4 addresses.
Though IPv6 adoption efforts have been ongoing, large parts of Chinese Internet infrastructure — especially legacy systems, enterprise networks, and hosting providers — remain IPv4-dependent. With continued expansion of online services, cloud hosting and mobile networks, demand remains strong.
Secondary-market data also shows active leasing and transfers involving Chinese entities, often seeking mid-size subnets to support new services. As IPv4 availability tightens globally, Chinese providers are increasingly turning to leasing platforms like i.Lease to satisfy demand.
#3 Japan — high allocation and constrained new supply
Japan holds a large share of global IPv4 allocations, with over 200 million addresses historically assigned.
With advanced infrastructure, high Internet penetration, and many legacy services, Japanese demand remains steady. Hosting providers, legacy enterprises, and ISPs maintaining legacy connectivity continue to require IPv4 blocks. Moreover, regional and global compliance requirements for some services mean IPv4 remains crucial.
As global IPv4 supply shrinks, Japanese demand is likely to drive more leasing and reuse of existing blocks — positioning Japan among the top demand countries in 2025.
#4 Germany — Europe’s demand focal point
Germany emerges as the highest-demand European country for IPv4. With more than 130 million addresses allocated, Germany has both historical legacy space and modern demand from data hosting, privacy-focused services, and enterprise infrastructure.
Market reports of IPv4 leasing and transfer activity show that European entities — including German firms — remain active, especially for smaller subnets suitable for regional hosting or content-delivery services.
Given regulatory requirements, data-residency needs, and demand for stable IPv4 connectivity for legacy clients, Germany represents a critical European hub in the IPv4 demand landscape.
An IP with a poor reputation can disrupt email delivery, block website access, and undermine customer trust. For businesses, this translates into lost revenue, failed customer acquisition, and operational bottlenecks—especially in sensitive industries like banking and healthcare. Repairing a damaged IP reputation is a time-consuming process involving malware removal, strengthened security, and improved sending practices. Even then, it can take weeks or months to fully restore trust, during which careful monitoring is essential to prevent further losses.
-Dr. Evelyn Shaw, Cybersecurity and Network Infrastructure Specialist
#5 United Kingdom — legacy allocations and ongoing need
Rounding out the top five is the United Kingdom, with over 120 million IPv4 addresses allocated historically.
Despite vigorous IPv6 promotion, many UK-based hosting providers, legacy enterprises and ISPs continue to depend heavily on IPv4. Because of global scarcity, acquisition of new IPv4 blocks is challenging — driving UK firms towards leasing and secondary-market solutions. Data indicates that UK entities rank among the top lessees in international IPv4 leasing platforms, especially for small-size subnets.
For organisations browsing i.Lease’s offerings, UK demand signals both opportunity and competition — making timing and clarity in leasing negotiations especially important.
Why these countries dominate demand — structural factors
Legacy allocations and early infrastructure deployment
Many of these nations received large IPv4 allocations during early internet growth phases. That historical advantage laid the groundwork for abundant legacy hardware, legacy services and large network footprints — all demanding IPv4 continuity.
High internet penetration and mature digital economies
Countries with advanced economies, broad broadband penetration, cloud providers, content-delivery networks, and IoT deployments have higher IP needs. High-traffic services, hosting, streaming, VPNs and enterprise services all drive IPv4 demand.
Slow or partial IPv6 adoption
In many regions, IPv6 adoption remains partial. Legacy services, enterprise environments, backward-compatible applications and client compatibility issues delay full migration — meaning IPv4 remains critical even in 2025.
Regulatory and compliance constraints
Some services — especially those involving legacy clients, enterprise software, or compliance obligations — require stable IPv4 connectivity. This further sustains demand despite IPv6 availability.
What this means for i.Lease users and the global IPv4 market
For users of i.Lease, knowing which countries lead IPv4 demand helps guide leasing and acquisition strategies. Because demand is concentrated in countries like the US, China, Japan, Germany and the UK, organisations seeking IPv4 blocks must expect competition — especially for small- to mid-size subnets, which are most versatile.
According to recent market reports, demand for /24–/22 subnets remains steady, driven by hosting providers, VPN and proxy services, and content-delivery networks.
As supply remains constrained, the leasing market is likely to stay active, prices may firm, and timing becomes critical. Users should prioritise clean, well-documented IPv4 blocks, avoid blacklisted ranges, and consider strategic hybrid models with IPv6 where possible.
For the global IPv4 market, these demand patterns highlight structural imbalance: a few countries continue to hold large allocations and high demand, while many regions — especially in developing economies — face legacy scarcity, limiting their ability to launch IPv4-dependent infrastructure
In today’s cloud landscape, providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud shape the reputation of IP addresses. While new IPs can start 'clean,' shared subnets mean the missteps of one user can impact many. To protect business operations, cloud users should prioritize dedicated IPs, maintain clean virtual machines, and actively monitor reputation shifts. Effective IP reputation management in the cloud demands vigilance, proactive measures, and continuous attention
– Alex Mercer, Cloud Security Specialist
Challenges and uncertainties in measuring IPv4 demand by country
While allocation and leasing data provide insight, “demand” remains hard to measure precisely. Allocation does not always reflect active use — some IPv4 blocks may sit unused, reserved, or unadvertised. A recent academic study found that active IPv4 addresses vary over time — with as much as 25% annual churn, reflecting dynamic reassignment, retirement, or reuse.
Moreover, the total number of unique devices behind each public IPv4 may vary — due to NAT, proxies, shared hosting or carrier-grade NAT (CGN). As one recent analysis by a major CDN noted, the global IPv4 count has stagnated, while IPv6 usage has grown — complicating demand-based forecasting.
Finally, external factors — regulatory changes, regional IPv6 push, pricing shifts, global trade rules — may rapidly shift demand, making any ranking of top-demand countries provisional rather than definitive.
Conclusion
In 2025, the countries with the highest demand for IPv4 remain largely those with historically large allocations and mature internet economies: the United States, China, Japan, Germany and the United Kingdom. Their demand is driven by legacy services, hosting providers, enterprise infrastructure and ongoing IPv4 dependence.
For users of i.Lease, this concentration of demand presents both opportunity and challenge. Clean, well-managed address blocks in these regions are valuable — but competitive. Timing, transparency, and due diligence matter more than ever.
As the IPv4 market continues to tighten and IPv6 adoption gradually increases, savvy organisations will treat IPv4 as a strategic but finite resource — leveraging leasing or acquisition where needed, but also planning for long-term infrastructure evolution.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Does “allocated IPv4 addresses” equal “active demand”?
Not always. Allocation indicates how many addresses are assigned to a country or registry, but many may be unused, reserved, or not publicly reachable. Studies show active IPv4 usage fluctuates significantly over time.
2. Why are some countries still so IPv4-heavy despite IPv6 availability?
Because legacy systems, client compatibility, enterprise services, and hosting requirements delay full IPv6 migration. IPv6 adoption remains uneven globally, so IPv4 remains critical for many environments.
3. How does leasing via a platform like i.Lease compare to buying IPv4 blocks?
Leasing offers flexibility, lower upfront cost, and access to blocks on demand — useful when supply is tight. Buying blocks carries higher cost and long-term commitment, but may provide stability. In 2025’s tight market, leasing remains popular for small and mid-size subnets.
4. Could developing countries challenge these top-demand countries soon?
Potentially — but only if IPv6 adoption rises significantly, or if global policies facilitate redistribution or leasing. Right now, IPv4 allocation imbalances and legacy infrastructure make catching up difficult.
5. How can businesses recover a damaged IP reputation?
Recovery starts by identifying and fixing the cause of the problem, such as removing malware or stopping spam. After cleanup, businesses request removal from blacklists and rebuild trust through steady, responsible sending and regular monitoring.
Related Blogs
Related Posts
Understanding Operational Risk in IPv4 Address Markets
IPv4 has long stopped being a simple technical identifier system. It has become a constrained, priced, and operationally embedded infrastructure asset class. “In the IPv4 market, execution is not paperwork. Execution is continuity under registry-layer uncertainty.”https://heng.lu/on-why-i-lease-exists-and-why-the-broker-question-is-really-a-registry-risk-question/ Yet most of the industry still speaks about it as if it were a straightforward marketplace problem: buyers, sellers, brokers, escrow, transfer, done. That framing is increasingly outdated. The real structure of riskRead more Related Posts 企业入站与出站 IPv4 租赁完整指南 租赁 IPv4 地址可以转移部分伴随完全所有权而来的风险。例如，购买地址可能会让组织暴露于价格波动、长期贬值风险以及信誉管理责任之中。通过 i.Lease 进行租赁，企业可以降低这些风险暴露，并在明确期限内维持可预测的成本，从而支持更可靠的预算规划和风险管理实践。这种方式也简化了基础设施管理，因为租赁供应商通常会负责滥用监控、信誉检查和注册机构协调，使承租方能够专注于核心业务功能，而不是 IP 资产管理。IPv4 租赁并不限于单一行业。托管服务商、云平台、电信公司、SaaS 公司和网络安全企业都可以从租赁中受益。例如，托管服务商可以在无需大量前期投资的情况下扩展服务器部署，而网络安全公司则可以根据客户需求灵活增加地址空间，而无需承诺完全购买。在销售、营销和监管测试中，租赁允许组织在特定地区试运行部署，而无需投入大量资本。这种战略灵活性支持创新，同时帮助企业在 IPv4 稀缺持续存在的市场中保持韧性。利用 i.Lease 进行 IPv4 租赁管理的好处非常清楚：具成本效益的访问、快速部署、信誉安全、可扩展性、地理多样性和持续支持。在 IPv4 地址稀缺且直接购买成本高昂的环境中，通过值得信赖的平台进行租赁，使组织能够维持连接、按需扩展基础设施，并高效管理资源。通过将 IPv4 租赁视为基础设施规划的重要组成部分，而不是临时替代方案，企业可以在应对 IPv4 Understanding Operational Risk in IPv4 Address Markets IPv4 has long stopped being a simple technical identifier system. It has become a constrained, priced, and operationally embedded infrastructure Por qué la mayoría de las empresas están expuestas accidentalmente al riesgo de fallo en la asignación de IPv4 La escasez de IPv4 es ampliamente comprendida. Lo que muchas empresas aún subestiman es el riesgo de continuidad relacionado con .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }
Why most enterprises are accidentally exposed to IPv4 allocation failure risk
IPv4 scarcity is widely understood. What many enterprises still underestimate is the continuity risk surrounding how address resources are governed and maintained. Enterprises often maintain operational use of IPv4 resources without full visibility into the continuity conditions supporting those allocations. The growing reliance on leasing, transfers, and provider-managed infrastructure is reshaping IPv4 Allocation into a long-term governance issue. IPv4 Allocation has quietly become a continuity issue For many enterpriseRead more Related Posts Understanding Operational Risk in IPv4 Address Markets IPv4 has long stopped being a simple technical identifier system. It has become a constrained, priced, and operationally embedded infrastructure Primauté du code en cours d’exécution : pourquoi la location d’adresses IPv4 doit être jugée sur la base de preuves opérationnelles La location IPv4 commence souvent par une question simple :Ce fournisseur peut-il nous fournir les adresses ?Mais pour les entreprises Risques liés au renouvellement d’IPv4 : quand le manque de responsabilisation se transforme en trahison du code en cours d’exécution La plupart des entreprises entrent sur le marché IPv4 avec un objectif simple. Elles ont besoin d’adresses. Peut-être en ont-elles .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }
Why i.lease Exists: IPv4 Continuity Is Not Commodity Access
Most businesses enter the IPv4 market with a simple goal. They need addresses. Maybe they need them for hosting.Maybe they need them for VPN infrastructure.Maybe they need them for cloud services, SaaS platforms, telecom expansion, email systems, cybersecurity tools, or customer-facing applications. So they search for an IPv4 provider. They compare prices. They check block sizes. They ask how fast delivery can happen. They look for a seller, broker, Related Posts 企业入站与出站 IPv4 租赁完整指南 租赁 IPv4 地址可以转移部分伴随完全所有权而来的风险。例如，购买地址可能会让组织暴露于价格波动、长期贬值风险以及信誉管理责任之中。通过 i.Lease 进行租赁，企业可以降低这些风险暴露，并在明确期限内维持可预测的成本，从而支持更可靠的预算规划和风险管理实践。这种方式也简化了基础设施管理，因为租赁供应商通常会负责滥用监控、信誉检查和注册机构协调，使承租方能够专注于核心业务功能，而不是 IP 资产管理。IPv4 租赁并不限于单一行业。托管服务商、云平台、电信公司、SaaS 公司和网络安全企业都可以从租赁中受益。例如，托管服务商可以在无需大量前期投资的情况下扩展服务器部署，而网络安全公司则可以根据客户需求灵活增加地址空间，而无需承诺完全购买。在销售、营销和监管测试中，租赁允许组织在特定地区试运行部署，而无需投入大量资本。这种战略灵活性支持创新，同时帮助企业在 IPv4 稀缺持续存在的市场中保持韧性。利用 i.Lease 进行 IPv4 租赁管理的好处非常清楚：具成本效益的访问、快速部署、信誉安全、可扩展性、地理多样性和持续支持。在 IPv4 地址稀缺且直接购买成本高昂的环境中，通过值得信赖的平台进行租赁，使组织能够维持连接、按需扩展基础设施，并高效管理资源。通过将 IPv4 租赁视为基础设施规划的重要组成部分，而不是临时替代方案，企业可以在应对 IPv4 Risques liés au renouvellement d’IPv4 : quand le manque de responsabilisation se transforme en trahison du code en cours d’exécution La plupart des entreprises entrent sur le marché IPv4 avec un objectif simple. Elles ont besoin d’adresses. Peut-être en ont-elles 大多数企业为何会意外面临 IPv4 地址分配失败的风险 IPv4 稀缺性已被广泛理解。许多企业仍然低估的是：地址资源如何被治理和维护所带来的连续性风险。 企业往往在持续使用 IPv4 资源的同时，并没有完全看清支撑这些分配的连续性条件。 对租赁、转让和供应商管理型基础设施的依赖不断增加，正在将 IPv4地址分配 重塑为一个长期治理问题。 IPv4地址分配已悄然成为连续性问题 对许多企业 IT 团队来说，IPv4 地址看起来仍然在运营上保持稳定。 应用程序仍然可以访问。云平台继续扩展。连接服务供应商在没有明显中断的情况下提供服务。从外部看，互联网似乎仍像过去一样运行。 然而，在这种运营稳定性之下，IPv4地址分配的结构已经发生了根本变化。 可自由分配的 IPv4 空间耗尽早已不是新闻。American Registry for .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }
