IPv4 address price history from exhaustion to 2026

StephanieStephanie
ipv4-address-price

An exploration of IPv4 address price trends from scarcity‑driven spikes to market corrections, and how IPv4 exhaustion shaped prices up to 2026.

What is IPv4 address exhaustion and why it matters?  

The IPv4 address space — consisting of about 4.3 billion unique addresses — was created early in the internet’s history without foresight of future demand. Over decades, rapid growth in users, devices, and always‑on connections exhausted the free pool of unallocated IPv4 addresses managed by global registries. When regional registries such as the American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) ran out of freely assignable IPv4 addresses, organisations could no longer obtain new addresses directly from central pools. This fundamental scarcity shifted IPv4 into a secondary market, where organisations buy, sell, and lease existing address blocks. As demand persisted even with IPv6 looming, this market evolved into a significant economic space with notable price trends

In the years following IPv4 depletion, IPv4 address prices began to rise steadily. According to historical broker data, average prices were modest in the mid‑2010s but climbed significantly over time. Between 2014 and 2021, a major IPv4 brokerage reported per‑IP sale prices rising from around $6–24 per IP in 2014 to $23–60 per IP by 2021, depending on block size and registry. Smaller blocks such as /24 (256 addresses) typically traded at higher per‑IP prices than larger blocks, reflecting differences in demand, transfer complexity, and utility. This trend underscored the growing premium associated with IPv4 scarcity as organisations sought to secure address space ahead of competitors.

External platforms tracking IPv4 pricing noted a roughly 20% annual growth rate in IPv4 prices over several years, illustrating a market where constrained supply collided with persistent demand.

Year

Approx. Price per IPv4 (Typical Range)

2014

~$6–$24

2017

~$13–$15

2021

~$45–$60

2024

~$32–$36

2025

~$35–$55

This table summarises approximate price levels for IPv4 addresses over time, showing the trend from modest early values to higher market rates following IPv4 exhaustion.

Price peaks and market volatility

The late 2010s and early 2020s saw notable spikes in IPv4 prices. In 2021 and into 2022, brokers recorded some of the highest per‑IP sale prices on record, with individual IPv4 addresses selling for around $60 or more. This represented both speculation and genuine demand from organisations reluctant to transition fully to IPv6 or those requiring backward compatibility with legacy systems. Price volatility was also influenced by wider market conditions such as the global economic cycle and pandemic disruptions. Following the pandemic slowdown in early 2020, network expansion paused, softening demand slightly before rebounding strongly in 2021 when many economies resumed growth.

The rise of leasing markets

As purchase prices fluctuated, many organisations turned to IPv4 leasing as a more predictable and cost‑effective solution. Leasing allows businesses to secure address space without large upfront costs, and monthly lease rates — often around $0.40–$0.50 per IP — remained relatively stable even while purchase prices fluctuated. Leasing gained traction because it resembles a subscription: predictable costs, scalability, and lower risk compared with long‑term capital investment in scarce assets.


Leasing remains attractive in 2025, especially for smaller and medium‑sized networks that prefer operational flexibility over committing large capital resources to permanent address ownership.

By 2024, IPv4 purchase prices had consolidated somewhat. Market reports indicated typical ranges of roughly $32–$36 per IPv4 address, with smaller blocks commanding higher per‑IP prices due to demand and convenience. Alternative reports place 2025 purchase price ranges at $35–$55 per IP, influenced by block size, reputation, and regional demand.

In early 2025, an influx of large block inventory led to a notable decline in average prices for large blocks (e.g. /16s), with per‑IP pricing dropping from nearly $50 in mid‑2024 to about $24 by March 2025 for some block sizes. Such shifts reflected market liquidity changes, larger address releases, and evolving buyer strategies.

Supply, demand, and exhaustion economics

The underlying driver of the IPv4 price history is economic: scarcity plus steady demand equals premiums. Because the free pool of IPv4 addresses was completely allocated long ago, nothing new enters the market, and the only way organisations acquire addresses is through transfer from existing holders.

 

Similar to many commodities with finite supply, IPv4 addresses have exhibited:

  • Price appreciation during tight supply periods,
  • Greater volatility around market shocks, and
  • Differentiation by block size and region.

The existence of both purchase and leasing markets reflects buyers’ different risk appetites and budget constraints.

IPv4 address pricing isn’t just about numbers — it’s about network strategy. With global IPv4 exhaustion now firmly in the past, organizations are making more nuanced decisions between purchasing blocks outright or leasing them to align with growth and transition to IPv6. While peak address prices in the early 2020s underscored scarcity, the market today is responding to smarter utilization, block consolidation, and leasing alternatives. For 2026, we anticipate continued moderation and segmentation in prices as operational agility and IPv6 readiness increasingly shape how enterprises value IPv4 resources.

– David Lim, Network Infrastructure Analyst

Expert views on IPv4 pricing dynamics

Industry observers have weighed in on IPv4 market trends. Analysts note that the IPv4 market’s trajectory reflects more than raw scarcity: it also reveals buyer sentiment about IPv6 transition timelines and how quickly organisations move to embrace IPv6 or depend on dual‑stack networks.

 

One market commentator noted that fluctuating purchase prices and the durability of leasing arrangements point to evolving network planning philosophies, where firms increasingly treat IPv4 addresses as managed assets rather than indefinite infrastructure investments.

 

Another perspective emphasises that the resilience of IPv4 demand, despite IPv6’s availability for decades, underscores business needs for compatibility with legacy systems, existing routing infrastructure, and gradual migration strategies.

 

Future outlook: 2026 and beyond

As we look ahead to 2026 and beyond, several trends are likely to shape IPv4 pricing:

  • Continued price moderation, especially if large block inventories remain available.
  • Stable leasing markets, with operators preferring predictable costs over speculative purchases.
  • Regional pricing variation, reflecting different demand and organisational migration patterns across markets.

Some analysts also forecast potential price rebounds if large block availability tightens, or if one of the major Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) enforces policy changes that affect transfer volumes. However, the coexistence of IPv4 purchase and lease markets suggests that prices may remain dynamic rather than trending uniformly upward.

 

Implications for businesses and network builders

For businesses planning network infrastructure, IPv4 price history highlights several practical considerations:

 

  • Budgeting for address acquisition: organisations must weigh the costs of purchase against long‑term leasing.
  • IPv6 migration strategy: as IPv6 adoption reduces dependency on IPv4, address acquisition costs become a planning factor rather than a barrier.
  • Risk management: leasing can serve as a hedge against market volatility and speculative price spikes.

Organisations should also consider IPv4 address reputation, since poor reputation can affect network deliverability and security policies, further influencing acquisition decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Why are IPv4 addresses expensive?

Because the free pool of IPv4 addresses has been fully allocated, they must be transferred between organisations, creating a secondary market with limited supply and steady demand.

2. How much does an IPv4 address cost in 2025?

Typical purchase prices in 2025 are around $35–$55 per IP, depending on block size, reputation and region.

3. What is IPv4 leasing and why use it?

Leasing allows businesses to obtain addresses temporarily, often at around $0.40–$0.50 per IP per month, which can be more predictable and affordable than purchasing outright.

4. Did IPv4 prices ever peak?

Yes — IPv4 sale prices reached approximately $60 per address in 2021‑2022 during peak demand.

5. Will IPv4 prices rise again?

Future prices depend on inventory, demand, and migration to IPv6; if block availability tightens, prices could rebound, but leasing markets may temper upward pressure.

Related Posts

Letter of Authorization of IPv4 Leasing

What Is a Letter of Authorization (LOA) in IP Leasing? LOA vs ROA and What to Verify

A Letter of Authorization (LOA) is a formal document in which the registered holder of an IP address block authorizes another party to announce that address space from a specified Autonomous System Number. It is the written permission that connects a contractual right to use address space with the technical act of routing it — and without it, upstream providers will generally refuse to accept your announcements. That refusalRead more Related Posts IP地址租赁中的授权书 (LOA) 是什么?LOA 与 ROA 的区别以及需要核实的内容 授权书(Letter of Authorization,LOA)是一份正式文件,由 IP 地址块的注册持有者授权另一方通过指定的自治系统编号(ASN)公告该地址空间。 它是一份书面授权,将使用地址空间的合同权利与实际进行路由公告的技术行为连接起来——如果没有 LOA,上游服务提供商通常会拒绝接受你的路由公告。 正是这种拒绝,使 LOA 在运营上具有决定性意义,而不仅仅是一项行政文件。Transit 服务提供商、数据中心和电信运营商都需要证明,公告某个前缀的一方确实获得了授权,因为接受未经授权的公告就意味着参与了一次路由劫持。Cloudflare 的 BYOIP 文档对此说明得非常明确:其 Transit 服务提供商要求在接受 Cloudflare 代表客户公告的路由之前提供 LOA,而且文件必须明确列出获得授权的前缀以及将用于公告这些前缀的 ASN。整个行业普遍都有类似要求。一家企业即使已经签署租赁协议、完成路由器配置,仍然可能因为 Qu’est-ce qu’une lettre d’autorisation (LOA) dans le cadre d’un bail de propriété intellectuelle ? LOA vs ROA et points à vérifier Une Lettre d’Autorisation (LOA) est un document officiel dans lequel le titulaire enregistré d’un bloc d’adresses IP autorise une autre ¿Qué es una Carta de Autorización (LOA) en el arrendamiento de propiedad intelectual? LOA vs. ROA y qué verificar Una Carta de Autorización (LOA) es un documento formal mediante el cual el titular registrado de un bloque de direcciones .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }

How Much IPv4 Space Do You Need

How Much IPv4 Space Do You Need? Block Sizes (/24, /23, /22, /21, /20) and Sizing Guide

Most businesses should size IPv4 by starting at a /24 — the smallest block the global Internet will reliably route — and sizing up from there based on how many addresses their actual services consume, plus room for growth. A /24 provides 256 addresses; each step up roughly doubles that. The right size is the one that covers your real address usage and near-term growth without leaving you payingRead more Related Posts ¿Qué es una Carta de Autorización (LOA) en el arrendamiento de propiedad intelectual? LOA vs. ROA y qué verificar Una Carta de Autorización (LOA) es un documento formal mediante el cual el titular registrado de un bloque de direcciones 数据中心IP地址与住宅IP地址:区别是什么?为什么这很重要? 常见问题解答 数据中心 IP 地址来源于商业数据中心、云服务提供商或托管公司,而住宅 IP 地址则由互联网服务提供商分配给家庭或企业用户。 两者的区别在于来源:一种来自为运行服务器而建设的基础设施,另一种来自为终端用户提供连接而建设的网络。正是这一根本区别,决定了互联网其他系统如何看待来自这两类地址的流量。 这个话题通常只会在代理和反检测的狭窄语境下被讨论,因此很容易形成片面的认知。实际上,数据中心 IP 与住宅 IP 的区别,对任何运营互联网基础设施的人都很重要,因为它会影响一个地址天然具有多少信任度、网站和安全系统如何响应它,以及这个地址适合什么用途。几乎所有合法的商业互联网基础设施——包括你使用的每个网站、API、邮件服务器和云服务——都运行在数据中心 IP 地址空间上,而这本来就是正确的使用方式。重点并不是哪一种更好、哪一种更差;而是它们服务于不同目的,也会受到不同方式的对待。了解自己正在使用或真正需要哪一种,可以避免许多本来可以避免的问题。 本文将解释这两种 IP 地址分别是什么、系统如何区分它们、为什么它们会受到不同对待,以及这种差异对于在公共 IPv4 地址空间上部署真实服务的企业意味着什么——包括它与地址信誉、地理定位以及不同使用场景究竟需要哪种地址空间之间的关系。 数据中心 Adresses IP de centres de données vs adresses IP résidentielles : quelle est la différence ? Pourquoi est-ce important ? Une adresse IP de centre de données provient d’un centre de données commercial, d’un fournisseur cloud ou d’une société d’hébergement, .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }

Datacenter vs Residential IP Addresses

Datacenter vs Residential IP Addresses: What’s the Difference and Why It Matters

A datacenter IP address originates from a commercial data center, cloud provider, or hosting company, while a residential IP address is assigned by an Internet service provider to a home or business subscriber. The difference is origin: one comes from infrastructure built to run servers, the other from a connection built to serve an end user. That single distinction shapes how the rest of the Internet treats traffic fromRead more Related Posts ¿Qué es una Carta de Autorización (LOA) en el arrendamiento de propiedad intelectual? LOA vs. ROA y qué verificar Una Carta de Autorización (LOA) es un documento formal mediante el cual el titular registrado de un bloque de direcciones 数据中心IP地址与住宅IP地址:区别是什么?为什么这很重要? 常见问题解答 数据中心 IP 地址来源于商业数据中心、云服务提供商或托管公司,而住宅 IP 地址则由互联网服务提供商分配给家庭或企业用户。 两者的区别在于来源:一种来自为运行服务器而建设的基础设施,另一种来自为终端用户提供连接而建设的网络。正是这一根本区别,决定了互联网其他系统如何看待来自这两类地址的流量。 这个话题通常只会在代理和反检测的狭窄语境下被讨论,因此很容易形成片面的认知。实际上,数据中心 IP 与住宅 IP 的区别,对任何运营互联网基础设施的人都很重要,因为它会影响一个地址天然具有多少信任度、网站和安全系统如何响应它,以及这个地址适合什么用途。几乎所有合法的商业互联网基础设施——包括你使用的每个网站、API、邮件服务器和云服务——都运行在数据中心 IP 地址空间上,而这本来就是正确的使用方式。重点并不是哪一种更好、哪一种更差;而是它们服务于不同目的,也会受到不同方式的对待。了解自己正在使用或真正需要哪一种,可以避免许多本来可以避免的问题。 本文将解释这两种 IP 地址分别是什么、系统如何区分它们、为什么它们会受到不同对待,以及这种差异对于在公共 IPv4 地址空间上部署真实服务的企业意味着什么——包括它与地址信誉、地理定位以及不同使用场景究竟需要哪种地址空间之间的关系。 数据中心 Adresses IP de centres de données vs adresses IP résidentielles : quelle est la différence ? Pourquoi est-ce important ? Une adresse IP de centre de données provient d’un centre de données commercial, d’un fournisseur cloud ou d’une société d’hébergement, .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }