IPv4 address price history from exhaustion to 2026

StephanieStephanie
ipv4-address-price

An exploration of IPv4 address price trends from scarcity‑driven spikes to market corrections, and how exhaustion shaped prices up to 2026.

What is IPv4 address exhaustion and why it matters?  

The IPv4 address space — consisting of about 4.3 billion unique addresses — was created early in the internet’s history without foresight of future demand. Over decades, rapid growth in users, devices, and always‑on connections exhausted the free pool of unallocated IPv4 addresses managed by global registries. When regional registries such as the American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) ran out of freely assignable IPv4 addresses, organisations could no longer obtain new addresses directly from central pools. This fundamental scarcity shifted IPv4 into a secondary market, where organisations buy, sell, and lease existing address blocks. As demand persisted even with IPv6 looming, this market evolved into a significant economic space with notable price trends

In the years following IPv4 depletion, IPv4 address prices began to rise steadily. According to historical broker data, average prices were modest in the mid‑2010s but climbed significantly over time. Between 2014 and 2021, a major IPv4 brokerage reported per‑IP sale prices rising from around $6–24 per IP in 2014 to $23–60 per IP by 2021, depending on block size and registry. Smaller blocks such as /24 (256 addresses) typically traded at higher per‑IP prices than larger blocks, reflecting differences in demand, transfer complexity, and utility. This trend underscored the growing premium associated with IPv4 scarcity as organisations sought to secure address space ahead of competitors.

External platforms tracking IPv4 pricing noted a roughly 20% annual growth rate in IPv4 prices over several years, illustrating a market where constrained supply collided with persistent demand.

Year

Approx. Price per IPv4 (Typical Range)

2014

~$6–$24

2017

~$13–$15

2021

~$45–$60

2024

~$32–$36

2025

~$35–$55

This table summarises approximate price levels for IPv4 addresses over time, showing the trend from modest early values to higher market rates following exhaustion.

Price peaks and market volatility

The late 2010s and early 2020s saw notable spikes in IPv4 prices. In 2021 and into 2022, brokers recorded some of the highest per‑IP sale prices on record, with individual IPv4 addresses selling for around $60 or more. This represented both speculation and genuine demand from organisations reluctant to transition fully to IPv6 or those requiring backward compatibility with legacy systems. Price volatility was also influenced by wider market conditions such as the global economic cycle and pandemic disruptions. Following the pandemic slowdown in early 2020, network expansion paused, softening demand slightly before rebounding strongly in 2021 when many economies resumed growth.

The rise of leasing markets

As purchase prices fluctuated, many organisations turned to IPv4 leasing as a more predictable and cost‑effective solution. Leasing allows businesses to secure address space without large upfront costs, and monthly lease rates — often around $0.40–$0.50 per IP — remained relatively stable even while purchase prices fluctuated. Leasing gained traction because it resembles a subscription: predictable costs, scalability, and lower risk compared with long‑term capital investment in scarce assets.


Leasing remains attractive in 2025, especially for smaller and medium‑sized networks that prefer operational flexibility over committing large capital resources to permanent address ownership.

By 2024, IPv4 purchase prices had consolidated somewhat. Market reports indicated typical ranges of roughly $32–$36 per IPv4 address, with smaller blocks commanding higher per‑IP prices due to demand and convenience. Alternative reports place 2025 purchase price ranges at $35–$55 per IP, influenced by block size, reputation, and regional demand.

 

In early 2025, an influx of large block inventory led to a notable decline in average prices for large blocks (e.g. /16s), with per‑IP pricing dropping from nearly $50 in mid‑2024 to about $24 by March 2025 for some block sizes. Such shifts reflected market liquidity changes, larger address releases, and evolving buyer strategies.

 

Simultaneously, data from IPv4.Global and other brokers suggested a gradual downward drift in average prices later in 2025, particularly across smaller and medium blocks. Such shifts reflected market liquidity changes, larger address releases, and evolving buyer strategies.

Supply, demand, and exhaustion economics

The underlying driver of the IPv4 price history is economic: scarcity plus steady demand equals premiums. Because the free pool of IPv4 addresses was completely allocated long ago, nothing new enters the market, and the only way organisations acquire addresses is through transfer from existing holders.

 

Similar to many commodities with finite supply, IPv4 addresses have exhibited:

  • Price appreciation during tight supply periods,
  • Greater volatility around market shocks, and
  • Differentiation by block size and region.

The existence of both purchase and leasing markets reflects buyers’ different risk appetites and budget constraints.

IPv4 address pricing isn’t just about numbers — it’s about network strategy. With global IPv4 exhaustion now firmly in the past, organizations are making more nuanced decisions between purchasing blocks outright or leasing them to align with growth and transition to IPv6. While peak address prices in the early 2020s underscored scarcity, the market today is responding to smarter utilization, block consolidation, and leasing alternatives. For 2026, we anticipate continued moderation and segmentation in prices as operational agility and IPv6 readiness increasingly shape how enterprises value IPv4 resources.

– David Lim, Network Infrastructure Analyst

Expert views on IPv4 pricing dynamics

Industry observers have weighed in on IPv4 market trends. Analysts note that the IPv4 market’s trajectory reflects more than raw scarcity: it also reveals buyer sentiment about IPv6 transition timelines and how quickly organisations move to embrace IPv6 or depend on dual‑stack networks.

 

One market commentator noted that fluctuating purchase prices and the durability of leasing arrangements point to evolving network planning philosophies, where firms increasingly treat IPv4 addresses as managed assets rather than indefinite infrastructure investments.

 

Another perspective emphasises that the resilience of IPv4 demand, despite IPv6’s availability for decades, underscores business needs for compatibility with legacy systems, existing routing infrastructure, and gradual migration strategies.

 

Future outlook: 2026 and beyond

As we look ahead to 2026 and beyond, several trends are likely to shape IPv4 pricing:

  • Continued price moderation, especially if large block inventories remain available.
  • Stable leasing markets, with operators preferring predictable costs over speculative purchases.
  • Regional pricing variation, reflecting different demand and organisational migration patterns across markets.

Some analysts also forecast potential price rebounds if large block availability tightens, or if one of the major Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) enforces policy changes that affect transfer volumes. However, the coexistence of IPv4 purchase and lease markets suggests that prices may remain dynamic rather than trending uniformly upward.

 

Implications for businesses and network builders

For businesses planning network infrastructure, IPv4 price history highlights several practical considerations:

 

  • Budgeting for address acquisition: organisations must weigh the costs of purchase against long‑term leasing.
  • IPv6 migration strategy: as IPv6 adoption reduces dependency on IPv4, address acquisition costs become a planning factor rather than a barrier.
  • Risk management: leasing can serve as a hedge against market volatility and speculative price spikes.

Organisations should also consider IPv4 address reputation, since poor reputation can affect network deliverability and security policies, further influencing acquisition decisions.

The IPv4 market reflects one of the most compelling examples of economic scarcity in the digital age. After the free pool exhausted, IPv4 addresses transitioned into a mature secondary market where block size, year, and buyer strategy all influence value. Prices surged in the early post‑exhaustion years, peaking as large enterprises competed for limited space. Over time, increased block availability and the rise of leasing solutions have tempered price volatility. Heading into 2026, we’re seeing a more balanced ecosystem — where buyers, sellers, and lessees negotiate not just on price, but on flexibility, timing, and network deployment plans

– Rachel Chen, IP Address Management Expert

Trusted IPv4 Leasing for Business Growth

Get enterprise-grade IPv4 space quickly, with seamless deployment and end-to-end management.

Get Started with i.lease

Frequently Asked Questions

1. 1. Why are IPv4 addresses expensive?

Because the free pool of IPv4 addresses has been fully allocated, they must be transferred between organisations, creating a secondary market with limited supply and steady demand.

2. How much does an IPv4 address cost in 2025?

Typical purchase prices in 2025 are around $35–$55 per IP, depending on block size, reputation and region.

3. What is IPv4 leasing and why use it?

Leasing allows businesses to obtain addresses temporarily, often at around $0.40–$0.50 per IP per month, which can be more predictable and affordable than purchasing outright.

4. Did IPv4 prices ever peak?

Yes — IPv4 sale prices reached approximately $60 per address in 2021‑2022 during peak demand.

5. Will IPv4 prices rise again?

Future prices depend on inventory, demand, and migration to IPv6; if block availability tightens, prices could rebound, but leasing markets may temper upward pressure.

Related Blogs

Related Posts

ipv-assets

Why self-holding can expose IPv4 assets to registry risk

Self-holding IPv4 assets increases exposure to registry risk as compliance responsibility, transfer validation, and governance pressure are concentrated internally. Key points   Self-holding IPv4 assets concentrate registry compliance responsibility, increasing exposure to audits, transfer validation issues, and documentation gaps. As IPv4 scarcity grows, registry governance becomes stricter, making ownership structure a key factor in operational risk. IPv4 ownership is now defined by governance, not possession   IPv4 addresses are no longerRead more Related Posts Mythes courants concernant la vente d’adresses IP Le marché secondaire des adresses IPv4 est souvent entouré de mystère, ce qui conduit de nombreuses organisations à conserver des Read more Comment acheter des adresses IPv4 via un courtier IP certifié Tu IPv4 parece estable, hasta que se rompa la cadena de proveedores Tu IPv4 parece estable... hasta que se rompe la cadena del proveedor Sus direcciones IPv4 pueden parecer estables hoy. Sus Read more .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }

IPv4 block cannot be renewed

Is Your Company Absorbing IPv4 Risk?

Is Your Company Becoming the Shock Absorber for IPv4 Risk?  Many businesses think the biggest IPv4 risk is not having enough addresses. That is only part of the problem. The more dangerous question is this: when something goes wrong, who absorbs the damage? If your IPv4 strategy is poorly structured, the answer may be your company. Your business may carry the customers, servers, routing, contracts, compliance duties, support workload,Read more Related Posts 如何通过认证的IP代理购买IPv4地址 购买 IPv4 地址空间需要符合相关政策、满足实际需求并获得注册管理机构的批准,因此,经过认证的 IP 经纪人在复杂的全球地址转移过程中扮演着至关重要的角色。IPv4 交易是受监管的转移,而非简单的购买——注册管理机构必须批准相关文件、理由和注册变更。经过认证的经纪人通过确保买家符合注册管理机构的政策、路由合法性和跨区域要求,从而降低风险并减少延误。 为什么公司仍然需要购买 IPv4 地址 全球 IPv4 地址资源实际上早在十多年前就已耗尽。区域互联网注册管理机构 (RIR) 现在仅分配有限的剩余地址,这意味着需要额外容量的组织必须通过地址转移的方式从现有持有者那里获得地址。尽管 IPv6 已被广泛采用,但由于无数系统(包括嵌入式设备、企业应用程序、托管平台和传统基础设施)仍然依赖于 IPv4 兼容性,因此需求依然存在。因此,市场应运而生,用于重新分配现有地址空间,而不是发放新的地址块。这就是经纪商发挥作用的地方。公司不能简单地汇款就获得 IP 地址块。相反,这个过程类似于受监管的所有权转让,其中政策合规性比价格谈判更为重要。 Read more Tu IPv4 parece estable, hasta que se rompa la cadena de proveedores Tu IPv4 parece estable... hasta que se rompe la cadena del proveedor Sus direcciones IPv4 pueden parecer estables hoy. Sus Read more Votre adresse IPv4 semble stable — jusqu’à ce que la chaîne de fournisseurs se rompe Votre IPv4 semble stable — jusqu'à ce que la chaîne de fournisseurs se rompe Vos adresses IPv4 peuvent sembler stables Read more .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }

Hidden Cost of Policy

What If a Policy Room Risks Your Running Network?

What If a Policy Room Puts Your Running Network at Risk? Your network may be running today. Your customers may be connected. Your servers may be online. Your IPv4 addresses may already support applications, hosting, VPNs, SaaS platforms, email systems, cloud workloads, and revenue-generating services. But what if the real risk is not inside your data centre? What if the risk sits above your network — inside policy rooms,Read more Related Posts 如何通过认证的IP代理购买IPv4地址 购买 IPv4 地址空间需要符合相关政策、满足实际需求并获得注册管理机构的批准,因此,经过认证的 IP 经纪人在复杂的全球地址转移过程中扮演着至关重要的角色。IPv4 交易是受监管的转移,而非简单的购买——注册管理机构必须批准相关文件、理由和注册变更。经过认证的经纪人通过确保买家符合注册管理机构的政策、路由合法性和跨区域要求,从而降低风险并减少延误。 为什么公司仍然需要购买 IPv4 地址 全球 IPv4 地址资源实际上早在十多年前就已耗尽。区域互联网注册管理机构 (RIR) 现在仅分配有限的剩余地址,这意味着需要额外容量的组织必须通过地址转移的方式从现有持有者那里获得地址。尽管 IPv6 已被广泛采用,但由于无数系统(包括嵌入式设备、企业应用程序、托管平台和传统基础设施)仍然依赖于 IPv4 兼容性,因此需求依然存在。因此,市场应运而生,用于重新分配现有地址空间,而不是发放新的地址块。这就是经纪商发挥作用的地方。公司不能简单地汇款就获得 IP 地址块。相反,这个过程类似于受监管的所有权转让,其中政策合规性比价格谈判更为重要。 Read more 您的 IPv4 连接看起来稳定 – 直到服务提供商的链路出现故障 您的 IPv4 连接看起来稳定—直到服务提供商的链路出现故障。 你的 IPv4 地址今天可能看起来很稳定。你的服务器在线。你的客户可以连接。你的应用程序正在运行。你的团队可能会认为一切正常,因为目前还没有发生故障。 但 IPv4 风险往往隐藏在表面之下。地址可能可以正常使用,但其背后的供应商链条可能很脆弱。来源可能不清晰。续期路径可能不确定。路由支持可能依赖另一方。注册机构关系可能位于某个上游环节。合同可能看起来很简单,但运营依赖可能比你的团队意识到的要大得多。 这就是危险所在。IPv4 通常不会在成为商业问题之前给你预警。它会正常运行——直到有一天不再正常。 你看不见的风险 大多数企业会检查 IPv4 地址是否可用。较少企业会检查该地址是否安全。 这种差异很重要。一个 IPv4 地址今天可以被路由,但仍然可能带有隐藏风险。它可能来自一个并不直接控制该地址的供应商。它可能依赖另一个上游方。它可能有不清晰的续期条款。它可能存在信誉问题。它可能与注册机构流程相关,而这些流程在出问题之前,你的企业可能并不了解。 结果就是一种虚假的安全感。你的基础设施看起来稳定,但你的企业实际上可能依赖于一条脆弱的权限、合同、路由安排和第三方决策链条。 在 Read more 为什么你会想使用 IPv6 引言 随着企业为互联网的长期发展做好准备,IPv6 的重要性日益凸显。它提供的地址空间远大于 IPv4,并支持现代网络扩展,尤其是在云服务、移动网络、物联网、托管和全球数字基础设施等领域。 然而,IPv6 的普及尚未完成。许多企业仍然依赖 IPv4 来满足兼容性、客户访问、电子邮件系统、托管和传统应用程序的需求。这意味着真正的问题不在于 IPv6 是否有用,而在于企业如何在保持 IPv4 连续性的同时采用 IPv6。 对于许多组织而言,最佳策略是务实的:做好 IPv6 的准备,同时在客户和系统仍然依赖 IPv4 的地方保留 IPv4 的可用性。 Read more .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }