Top 5 countries with the highest IPv4 demand in 2025

Standfirst — As IPv4 remains scarce, some nations show particularly strong demand for legacy IP resources. Knowing which helps guide leasing or acquisition strategies.
Table of Contents
- The United States, China, Japan, Germany and the UK are the top nations demanding IPv4, reflecting both legacy allocation and continuing pressure to support IPv4-only services.
- For organisations using i.Lease, focusing on these high-demand markets is key — competition is fierce, but so is the value of clean, compliant IPv4 space.
What “IPv4 demand” means — and why it matters
When we talk about “IPv4 demand,” we refer to the pressure on the finite pool of IPv4 addresses — how many organisations, data centres and ISPs are seeking IPv4 blocks for hosting, legacy support, VPNs, proxy services, or to ensure compatibility. Demand spikes when IPv6 adoption lags, legacy services remain IPv4-only, or new infrastructure requires routable IPv4 addresses.
Because IPv4 is a finite resource and globally exhausted, demand and supply drive a secondary market of IPv4 leasing, transfers, and brokerage. For platforms such as i.Lease, understanding which countries lead demand helps to price, allocate and manage inventory strategically.
Recent market analyses indicate that as demand remains elevated and supply tightens, the average cost of leasing IPv4 has remained stable but active — signalling on-going competition for address space, especially among small and mid-size providers.
Methodology: How we identify “top demand” countries
To compile the list of top IPv4–demand countries in 2025, we consider a combination of: global allocations, recent leasing and transfer data, market activity in IPv4 subnets, and regional hosting/ISP demand reflected in secondary-market metrics. We draw from public datasets of IPv4 allocation by country, and from market-trend reports covering leasing and trading activity.
While allocation doesn’t map perfectly to demand, high-allocation countries typically show higher utilisation, frequent subnet turnover, and larger private sector infrastructure — all indicators of demand. Secondary-market data helps highlight where demand continues to outpace supply.
The result: a current view of which countries are most aggressively seeking IPv4 resources in 2025.
#1 United States — still dominating IPv4 demand
The United States leads the world in IPv4 allocation and demand. With over 1.2 billion IPv4 addresses allocated, it accounts for a substantial share of global address space.
This allocation reflects both legacy assignments and ongoing demand. US-based data centres, content delivery networks, VPN providers, cloud hosting services and legacy enterprise systems all contribute to continuous demand for IPv4. The licensing and leasing market remains robust; smaller providers especially compete heavily for /24–/19 subnets, driving stable pricing and high utilisation.
For any organisation looking to acquire IPv4 via i.Lease, the US market remains critical — but also highly competitive. Clean, well-documented IPv4 blocks are in demand, and providers must be ready for rapid acquisition when subnets become available.
#2 China — rising demand amid growth and legacy constraints
China ranks second in total allocated IPv4 addresses: per global data, the country holds upwards of 350 million IPv4 addresses.
Though IPv6 adoption efforts have been ongoing, large parts of Chinese Internet infrastructure — especially legacy systems, enterprise networks, and hosting providers — remain IPv4-dependent. With continued expansion of online services, cloud hosting and mobile networks, demand remains strong.
Secondary-market data also shows active leasing and transfers involving Chinese entities, often seeking mid-size subnets to support new services. As IPv4 availability tightens globally, Chinese providers are increasingly turning to leasing platforms like i.Lease to satisfy demand.
#3 Japan — high allocation and constrained new supply
Japan holds a large share of global IPv4 allocations, with over 200 million addresses historically assigned.
With advanced infrastructure, high Internet penetration, and many legacy services, Japanese demand remains steady. Hosting providers, legacy enterprises, and ISPs maintaining legacy connectivity continue to require IPv4 blocks. Moreover, regional and global compliance requirements for some services mean IPv4 remains crucial.
As global IPv4 supply shrinks, Japanese demand is likely to drive more leasing and reuse of existing blocks — positioning Japan among the top demand countries in 2025.
#4 Germany — Europe’s demand focal point
Germany emerges as the highest-demand European country for IPv4. With more than 130 million addresses allocated, Germany has both historical legacy space and modern demand from data hosting, privacy-focused services, and enterprise infrastructure.
Market reports of IPv4 leasing and transfer activity show that European entities — including German firms — remain active, especially for smaller subnets suitable for regional hosting or content-delivery services.
Given regulatory requirements, data-residency needs, and demand for stable IPv4 connectivity for legacy clients, Germany represents a critical European hub in the IPv4 demand landscape.
An IP with a poor reputation can disrupt email delivery, block website access, and undermine customer trust. For businesses, this translates into lost revenue, failed customer acquisition, and operational bottlenecks—especially in sensitive industries like banking and healthcare. Repairing a damaged IP reputation is a time-consuming process involving malware removal, strengthened security, and improved sending practices. Even then, it can take weeks or months to fully restore trust, during which careful monitoring is essential to prevent further losses.
-Dr. Evelyn Shaw, Cybersecurity and Network Infrastructure Specialist
#5 United Kingdom — legacy allocations and ongoing need
Rounding out the top five is the United Kingdom, with over 120 million IPv4 addresses allocated historically.
Despite vigorous IPv6 promotion, many UK-based hosting providers, legacy enterprises and ISPs continue to depend heavily on IPv4. Because of global scarcity, acquisition of new IPv4 blocks is challenging — driving UK firms towards leasing and secondary-market solutions. Data indicates that UK entities rank among the top lessees in international IPv4 leasing platforms, especially for small-size subnets.
For organisations browsing i.Lease’s offerings, UK demand signals both opportunity and competition — making timing and clarity in leasing negotiations especially important.
Why these countries dominate demand — structural factors
Legacy allocations and early infrastructure deployment
Many of these nations received large IPv4 allocations during early internet growth phases. That historical advantage laid the groundwork for abundant legacy hardware, legacy services and large network footprints — all demanding IPv4 continuity.
High internet penetration and mature digital economies
Countries with advanced economies, broad broadband penetration, cloud providers, content-delivery networks, and IoT deployments have higher IP needs. High-traffic services, hosting, streaming, VPNs and enterprise services all drive IPv4 demand.
Slow or partial IPv6 adoption
In many regions, IPv6 adoption remains partial. Legacy services, enterprise environments, backward-compatible applications and client compatibility issues delay full migration — meaning IPv4 remains critical even in 2025.
Regulatory and compliance constraints
Some services — especially those involving legacy clients, enterprise software, or compliance obligations — require stable IPv4 connectivity. This further sustains demand despite IPv6 availability.
What this means for i.Lease users and the global IPv4 market
For users of i.Lease, knowing which countries lead IPv4 demand helps guide leasing and acquisition strategies. Because demand is concentrated in countries like the US, China, Japan, Germany and the UK, organisations seeking IPv4 blocks must expect competition — especially for small- to mid-size subnets, which are most versatile.
According to recent market reports, demand for /24–/22 subnets remains steady, driven by hosting providers, VPN and proxy services, and content-delivery networks.
As supply remains constrained, the leasing market is likely to stay active, prices may firm, and timing becomes critical. Users should prioritise clean, well-documented IPv4 blocks, avoid blacklisted ranges, and consider strategic hybrid models with IPv6 where possible.
For the global IPv4 market, these demand patterns highlight structural imbalance: a few countries continue to hold large allocations and high demand, while many regions — especially in developing economies — face legacy scarcity, limiting their ability to launch IPv4-dependent infrastructure
In today’s cloud landscape, providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud shape the reputation of IP addresses. While new IPs can start 'clean,' shared subnets mean the missteps of one user can impact many. To protect business operations, cloud users should prioritize dedicated IPs, maintain clean virtual machines, and actively monitor reputation shifts. Effective IP reputation management in the cloud demands vigilance, proactive measures, and continuous attention
– Alex Mercer, Cloud Security Specialist
Challenges and uncertainties in measuring IPv4 demand by country
While allocation and leasing data provide insight, “demand” remains hard to measure precisely. Allocation does not always reflect active use — some IPv4 blocks may sit unused, reserved, or unadvertised. A recent academic study found that active IPv4 addresses vary over time — with as much as 25% annual churn, reflecting dynamic reassignment, retirement, or reuse.
Moreover, the total number of unique devices behind each public IPv4 may vary — due to NAT, proxies, shared hosting or carrier-grade NAT (CGN). As one recent analysis by a major CDN noted, the global IPv4 count has stagnated, while IPv6 usage has grown — complicating demand-based forecasting.
Finally, external factors — regulatory changes, regional IPv6 push, pricing shifts, global trade rules — may rapidly shift demand, making any ranking of top-demand countries provisional rather than definitive.
Conclusion
In 2025, the countries with the highest demand for IPv4 remain largely those with historically large allocations and mature internet economies: the United States, China, Japan, Germany and the United Kingdom. Their demand is driven by legacy services, hosting providers, enterprise infrastructure and ongoing IPv4 dependence.
For users of i.Lease, this concentration of demand presents both opportunity and challenge. Clean, well-managed address blocks in these regions are valuable — but competitive. Timing, transparency, and due diligence matter more than ever.
As the IPv4 market continues to tighten and IPv6 adoption gradually increases, savvy organisations will treat IPv4 as a strategic but finite resource — leveraging leasing or acquisition where needed, but also planning for long-term infrastructure evolution.
Trusted IPv4 Leasing for Business Growth
Get enterprise-grade IPv4 space quickly, with seamless deployment and end-to-end management.
Get Started with i.leaseFrequently Asked Questions
1. Does “allocated IPv4 addresses” equal “active demand”?
Not always. Allocation indicates how many addresses are assigned to a country or registry, but many may be unused, reserved, or not publicly reachable. Studies show active IPv4 usage fluctuates significantly over time.
2. Why are some countries still so IPv4-heavy despite IPv6 availability?
Because legacy systems, client compatibility, enterprise services, and hosting requirements delay full IPv6 migration. IPv6 adoption remains uneven globally, so IPv4 remains critical for many environments.
3. How does leasing via a platform like i.Lease compare to buying IPv4 blocks?
Leasing offers flexibility, lower upfront cost, and access to blocks on demand — useful when supply is tight. Buying blocks carries higher cost and long-term commitment, but may provide stability. In 2025’s tight market, leasing remains popular for small and mid-size subnets.
4. Could developing countries challenge these top-demand countries soon?
Potentially — but only if IPv6 adoption rises significantly, or if global policies facilitate redistribution or leasing. Right now, IPv4 allocation imbalances and legacy infrastructure make catching up difficult.
5. How can businesses recover a damaged IP reputation?
Recovery starts by identifying and fixing the cause of the problem, such as removing malware or stopping spam. After cleanup, businesses request removal from blacklists and rebuild trust through steady, responsible sending and regular monitoring.
Related Blogs
相关文章

IPv4市场的未来
尽管 IPv6 持续扩展,稀缺性仍使 IPv4 保持价值,并支撑着一个全球性的二级市场,在这个市场中,IP 地址正日益作为可交易的数字资产发挥作用。 有限的 IPv4 供应催生了一个成熟的二级市场,地址段在全球范围内被买卖和租赁。 价格虽会波动,但来自云计算、托管服务和 AI 基础设施的持续需求表明,IPv4 市场未来多年仍将保持活跃。 发生了什么事? 数字商品的崛起 全球 IPv4 地址市场正进入一个新阶段。IPv4 地址曾被视为由互联网注册机构免费分配的技术资源,如今已作为稀缺的数字资产被交易、租赁和管理。 这种转变源于一个简单的结构性事实:IPv4 协议仅支持大约 43 亿个唯一地址,而全球可自由分配的地址池实际上已经耗尽。随着互联网连接需求不断扩大——从智能手机和云计算到物联网设备——可用供应持续减少。 如今,需要额外地址的公司通常通过转让或二级市场获取,而不是直接从注册机构获得分配。其结果是,一个全球性的市场已经形成,在这个市场中,地址段可以被估值、交易,甚至作为金融工具使用。 根据行业数据,IPv4 地址已经从几乎可以忽略不计的基础设施组成部分,演变为一种被认可的商品。分析人士指出,机构如今可以从此前未使用的地址分配中获得可观回报,而某些地址段根据其规模和信誉,有时价值可达数百万美元。 Larus 等服务商以及类似交易平台所提供的经纪与市场服务的出现,表明互联网寻址系统已与现代数字经济紧密交织在一起。 IPv4 如何成为可交易资产 在早期互联网时代,IP 地址市场的概念几乎难以想象。数十年来,组织可以以极低成本、且监管有限的情况下,从区域互联网注册机构(RIR)获得大规模地址段。 然而,IPv4 地址池的耗尽改变了这一格局。 当新的地址分配不再可获得时,需求开始转向组织之间的转让。那些拥有未使用地址段的机构——通常是大学、早期互联网服务提供商或传统科技企业——突然持有了其他组织在运营和扩展中所需的资产。 行业报告显示,IPv4 地址的价值发生了显著变化。2014 年,IPv4 地址的平均交易价格约为每个 15 美元。五年内,这一价格翻倍至约 30 美元,而到 2021–2022 年,一些交易甚至超过每个地址 45 至 60 美元。 正如一位经纪行业高管在分析中所指出的,IPv4 地址实际上已成为数字基础设施经济中的一种“商品”。 这一转变重新塑造了企业管理网络资源的方式。IPv4 地址不再仅仅被视为技术标识符,IPv4 地址资源如今也被计入资产负债表,成为可以变现的资产。 IPv4 市场结构 现代 IPv4 生态系统由多个相互联动的组成部分构成: 区域互联网注册机构(RIR)ARIN、RIPE NCC 和 APNIC 等机构负责监管地址分配,并监督其各自区域内的转让活动。 经纪商和交易平台专业中介机构协助促成交易,帮助买家寻找可用地址段,并确保交易符合注册机构政策要求。 二级市场买家云服务提供商、托管公司、电信运营商和数据平台是 IPv4 资源的主要购买方。 地址转让流程本身类似于受监管的资产交易。买方必须说明其对地址资源的需求,并遵守注册机构的相关要求,而经纪商通常还会提供托管服务和验证流程,以降低欺诈风险。Read more Related Posts IPv4 租赁 vs 购买|2026 年 IPv4 市场结构性风险解析 在 IPv4 稀缺持续加剧的市场中,租赁与购买已不只是价格差异,而是两种不同的风险结构。本文解析 IPv4 租赁与购买的成本、控制权、连续性、市场风险与适用场景,帮助企业制定更合适的 IP 策略。 重点摘要 到了 2026 年,IPv4 租赁已经成为一种更灵活的运营模式,月租价格相对稳定,主要由稀缺性和快速部署需求驱动。IPv4 购买则越来越像一种长期资产策略,但也会暴露在价格周期、流动性变化和资金锁定风险之下。 IPv4 已经不只是基础设施,它是一个稀缺市场 IPv4 地址系统已经完全转入二级市场生态。自从 IANA 的免费分配耗尽后,组织现在主要依赖以下方式取得 IPv4:通过区域互联网注册机构(RIR)的转移经纪撮合的二级市场买卖像 Read more IPv4 leasing vs purchasing: structural risk in the IPv4 address market IPv4 leasing vs purchasing reflects a structural shift in IP address markets, balancing cost, control, scarcity, and operational risk in Read more تأجير IPv4 لمراكز البيانات: ما الذي تحتاج إلى معرفته مع تزايد ندرة IPv4، تعتمد مراكز البيانات بشكل متزايد على التأجير لتوسيع البنية التحتية، والتحكم في التكاليف، والحفاظ على اتصال Read more .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }

市场上的IPv4定价由哪些因素决定?
IPv4 地址的稀缺性、不断变化的需求以及 i.lease 等租赁平台正在重塑全球 IPv4 地址的价值评估和交易方式。 IPv4 地址的定价主要受稀缺性、区块大小以及不同地区和行业需求波动的影响。 包括 i.lease 在内的租赁模式正在动荡的购买市场中稳定成本。 市场上的IPv4定价由哪些因素决定? 稀缺性塑造的市场 IPv4 地址曾经是自由分配的,如今却已成为一种可交易的数字商品。过去十年间,随着全球 IPv4 地址枯竭的加剧,一个二级市场应运而生,各机构在此买卖和租赁地址块。 如今,IPv4 的定价反映了经济稀缺性、技术限制和制度安排之间复杂的相互作用。虽然 2025-2026 年的平均购买价格大致在每个地址 30 美元到 50 美元之间,但这一价格范围掩盖了因地址块大小、地理位置和使用情况而产生的显著差异。 与此同时,租赁引入了一种更可预测的定价模式。月租费通常在每个 IP 地址 0.30 美元到 0.50 美元左右,形成了一种类似订阅的市场,这与波动较大的购买价格形成鲜明对比。 最终,IPv4 并没有一个单一的“价格”,而是一个受结构性限制塑造的碎片化市场。 稀缺性仍然是根本驱动因素 IPv4 定价最关键的因素很简单:地址数量有限。 IPv4 协议提供约 43 亿个地址,而所有由区域注册机构管理的主要地址池自 2010 年代初以来均已耗尽。剩余的地址只能通过转让或租赁的方式重新分配。正如一份行业分析报告指出,“供应固定,需求增长”是市场价格动态的根本原因。 这种稀缺性已将 IPv4 从基础设施转变为一种资产类别。2020 年至 2022 年间,IPv4 价格飙升,一度达到每个地址 45 至 60 美元的高位,之后近年来有所回落。即使价格出现暂时性调整,有限供应造成的结构性上限仍然支撑着 IPv4 的长期估值。 需求模式正在转变,而不是消失 虽然稀缺性是恒定的,但需求却并非如此。相反,需求变得更加分散且周期性波动。 云计算、移动服务和联网设备的兴起持续支撑着基本需求。与此同时,大型买家(尤其是超大规模数据中心)的行为对价格产生了不成比例的影响。 例如,到 2025 年,IPv4 总传输量增长了 28%,而价格却下降了约 33%,这反映出主要参与者竞价力度的减弱。 这揭示了一个关键的动态:需求并非简单地推高价格,它还会重新分配市场力量。当大型买家退出市场时,小型参与者就会涌入,从而增加交易量,但降低价格压力。 区块大小造成价格不对称 并非所有IPv4地址的价格都相同。地址块大小起着至关重要的作用。Read more Related Posts IPv4 租赁 vs 购买|2026 年 IPv4 市场结构性风险解析 在 IPv4 稀缺持续加剧的市场中,租赁与购买已不只是价格差异,而是两种不同的风险结构。本文解析 IPv4 租赁与购买的成本、控制权、连续性、市场风险与适用场景,帮助企业制定更合适的 IP 策略。 重点摘要 到了 2026 年,IPv4 租赁已经成为一种更灵活的运营模式,月租价格相对稳定,主要由稀缺性和快速部署需求驱动。IPv4 购买则越来越像一种长期资产策略,但也会暴露在价格周期、流动性变化和资金锁定风险之下。 IPv4 已经不只是基础设施,它是一个稀缺市场 IPv4 地址系统已经完全转入二级市场生态。自从 IANA 的免费分配耗尽后,组织现在主要依赖以下方式取得 IPv4:通过区域互联网注册机构(RIR)的转移经纪撮合的二级市场买卖像 Read more IPv4 leasing vs purchasing: structural risk in the IPv4 address market IPv4 leasing vs purchasing reflects a structural shift in IP address markets, balancing cost, control, scarcity, and operational risk in Read more تأجير IPv4 لمراكز البيانات: ما الذي تحتاج إلى معرفته مع تزايد ندرة IPv4، تعتمد مراكز البيانات بشكل متزايد على التأجير لتوسيع البنية التحتية، والتحكم في التكاليف، والحفاظ على اتصال Read more .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }
关于 弹性IP地址 Elastic IP address: AWS 用户指南
在云计算中,保持 稳定的 IP 地址 对于 网站托管、应用程序和网络管理 至关重要。这就是 Elastic IP 地址(弹性 IP) 发挥作用的地方。如果你使用 亚马逊云 AWS,了解 Elastic IP 的工作原理,可以帮助你 提高可靠性、防止宕机,并优化云端成本。本文将详细介绍 Elastic IP 的定义、工作方式、优势及最佳实践。 什么是弹性 IP 地址? Elastic IP 地址 是 AWS 提供的静态公网 IPv4 地址,可分配给 Amazon EC2(Elastic Compute Cloud)实例。与普通公网 IP 不同,Elastic IP 在实例重启后不会更改,确保服务稳定运行。 弹性 IP 的工作原理 Elastic IP 地址来自 AWS 的 IP 地址池,并可随时分配给 EC2 实例。如果实例发生故障,你可以 快速将 Elastic IP 重新绑定到另一台实例,从而减少宕机时间,保持业务连续性。 ? Elastic IP 主要特点: ✔ 静态 IP 地址 – 不会随实例重启而改变。✔ 可自由分配 – 可在同一区域内的不同实例间切换。✔Read more Related Posts IPv4 租赁 vs 购买|2026 年 IPv4 市场结构性风险解析 在 IPv4 稀缺持续加剧的市场中,租赁与购买已不只是价格差异,而是两种不同的风险结构。本文解析 IPv4 租赁与购买的成本、控制权、连续性、市场风险与适用场景,帮助企业制定更合适的 IP 策略。 重点摘要 到了 2026 年,IPv4 租赁已经成为一种更灵活的运营模式,月租价格相对稳定,主要由稀缺性和快速部署需求驱动。IPv4 购买则越来越像一种长期资产策略,但也会暴露在价格周期、流动性变化和资金锁定风险之下。 IPv4 已经不只是基础设施,它是一个稀缺市场 IPv4 地址系统已经完全转入二级市场生态。自从 IANA 的免费分配耗尽后,组织现在主要依赖以下方式取得 IPv4:通过区域互联网注册机构(RIR)的转移经纪撮合的二级市场买卖像 Read more IPv4 leasing vs purchasing: structural risk in the IPv4 address market IPv4 leasing vs purchasing reflects a structural shift in IP address markets, balancing cost, control, scarcity, and operational risk in Read more تأجير IPv4 لمراكز البيانات: ما الذي تحتاج إلى معرفته مع تزايد ندرة IPv4، تعتمد مراكز البيانات بشكل متزايد على التأجير لتوسيع البنية التحتية، والتحكم في التكاليف، والحفاظ على اتصال Read more .related-post {} .related-post .post-list { text-align: left; } .related-post .post-list .item { margin: 5px; padding: 10px; } .related-post .headline { font-size: 18px !important; color: #999999 !important; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_thumb { max-height: 220px; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_title { font-size: 16px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } .related-post .post-list .item .post_excerpt { font-size: 13px; color: #3f3f3f; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; display: block; text-decoration: none; } @media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 30%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .related-post .post-list .item { width: 90%; } }